Cathy widener with the San Francisco airport and i would respectfully request that this item be continued i understand that there will be a little bit of discussion about some concerns that have just been raised that i would like some time to try to address. Internally with the revenue staff and the airport tenants before we bring this to you, but in the meantime i would be happy to answer questions if you have them. Thank you. Supervisor campos . Thank you, i do have a number of questions about this. With the over arching issue being why are we not doing competitive bid here . But in terms of a continuance, how much time are you talking about . Just to get a better sense . Off the top of my head, i would ask for january at some point. Just because it was the tenyear extension issue, do you want me to go over the item . Why dont we do that. So the item that is before you has to deal with five existing leases for airport food and beverage tenants and there is a series of reno vasings th
Which included the entire airport operations, was in 1972. And there have been various reviews of the airport such as landing fees and other matters, but there has not been to my knowledge, a comprehensive management order of the airport since 1972. Now, as a matter of sort of the best practice, from what i remember, our own board rules have a suggested time line for how often a management audit is supposed to be conducted. And can you address that . Well, the, and i think that the board once authorized or directed a management audit and the department should undergo a management audit every three years. But as a every eight. Every eight, excuse me, every eight years, that is what i was thinking. As a practical matter, that is a difficult thing to do under our existing work load, but clearly this department has not had a comprehensive for. Controller . Just to briefly add that i think that mr. Rose is speaking to the boards budget and analyst office, and we also do the auditing in the
You have them. Thank you. Supervisor campos . Thank you, i do have a number of questions about this. With the over arching issue being why are we not doing competitive bid here . But in terms of a continuance, how much time are you talking about . Just to get a better sense . Off the top of my head, i would ask for january at some point. Just because it was the tenyear extension issue, do you want me to go over the item . Why dont we do that. So the item that is before you has to deal with five existing leases for airport food and beverage tenants and there is a series of reno vasings that have been ongoing and many of these have affected our ten tenants in terms of locations, and locations have been closed. The five leases before you are in the terminal three east. And that terminal has been the construction has started and those locations no longer exist. So, the series of amendments before you would contemplate a suspension would address the new Square Footage in the renovated termi
Basically see that footage in real time, where we can go and narrow it down. The current coverage for those particular areas are where the cameras are far away and you have to zoom in and you may be able to see the vehicle or you may not. The problem that i have with these amendments if you look at the original rfp, you know you have got, i think three responses to the rfp. And at that point, this actually did not come before the board. Because it was under 10 million. Had it had the scope actually included the added new scope that is included here, it clearly would have come before the board of supervisors for approval because it would have, you know, gone past the ten Million Dollar threshold, the problem that i have is when you change the scope to this magnitude, it is never really clear if you are actually getting the best deal for the tax payer, because if the rfp had done with the proper scope to begin with, it may be that maybe somebody else could have given you a better deal, a