that michael made, hard to tell what was on the list. remember in 2011 the department of justice convened a similar meeting to look at the options in terms of executive action and a list that was actually put together that got put on the back burner with other issues that took center stage. clearly there was research that has been done in the administration regarding what kind of things can be done f. we start with mental health or enforcing the laws, perhaps that s a way to get buy in from the nra or to try a wedge between the nra leadership and the membership. what we have seen is very divergent views on the issues. let me read what they talk about with the gun challenge in this going at an incremental pace. the risk of the approach is that it can t pass congress. it s a bit of a motor cal box for the white house.
has a super pac and running it, the money bunny, do you think that is going to be a priority of the president s if he is leektsed to a send elected to a second term. if governor romney becomes president romney, then we re going to be in a situation where you have an administration that s based on these super pacs and is not going to be in any kind of hurry to change things. the point that michael made that s so good the way this excluded people from the process, is going to be a big a big part of 2016 because right now there s a lot of money, numbers are very big, but in 2016 it s going to be all about how big is your super pac. i ll hazard a guess. i don t think anybody will win an open party primary for president without a super pac and a couple billionaires in the future as long as super pacs exist. it s not possible. you re not going to have social conservative candidates winning without super pacs and most won t have them and same on the left. it s going to have the effec