Real wage growth, what we saw in the late 1990s was was was 1. 5 , 2 . It is better than the declining wages we have seen so much of the last 30 years. The Unemployment Rate picked up. More americans were entering the labor force, trying to find a job traded the s p just cut greeces longterm Credit Rating to b minus. Liquidity constraints have got the timeframe for greece to reach a bailout deal. The euro zone government say they will not grant greeces request for shortterm financing. The french president and german chancellor are in moscow to meet with vladimir putin. The big goal is to stop the bloodshed in eastern ukraine. Merkel is said to be pessimistic about putins willingness to end the crisis even with the threat of tougher actions from europe. Back home its an ugly day for tech companies. Shares of yelp following the most ever in a single day, actor after active users declined. Shares of gopro also getting hammered. Investors also concerned that the companys coo has retired or
And we remember the russians had this basketball sized entity, this button neck. Wonder putting something in space is surpassed by this. And we leave with an appreciation with an understanding of the difficulty of sustainable credibility and the fragility of stability. And it was not a happy place to be at that point. It was very big just before the election and completely disappeared after the election as well and it was a meth, in fact. So in the 1960s, and what you should be thinking about here or holding onto here is the importance of the revelers to the situation that we have in northeast asia, south korea, japan, and the middle east with israel and around and perhaps others. So in the 1960s, which might be called these years, we are dealing with the credibility and the concept of stability and vulnerability. This includes flexible response which is used in two ways are least. One is in conventional forces that we have a more flexible response and its also used to cover the topics
Think that it will increase my skills and so we would say yes that makes sense and sometimes we dont. In terms of the flow of partnerships and information back and forth, ive been very public about saying for the National Security agency i would like us to create a model where the members of our workforce dont necessarily spend 30 or 45 years working directly for us which has been made historic norm. Its amazing when i say tell me how long youve been with the nsa. 30, 35 years, 38 years. I said goodbye to an employee after 50 years. When ive talked about is particularly given the state of the technology, we have to create a world where evil from nsa can leave for life and work in the private sector provides also like to create a world where does private sector can come spend a little time with us because one of the challenges is the nation that we are dealing with and you have seen this play out over the last year or so in particular. We talk past each other a lot because we dont under
Vice chairman and i have done. We put together a bipartisan bill put out by that committee of a vote of 12 three some groups still like this or that to look forward to our staff director is here today so we dare open but we do not want to produce something that cannot get a vote. We have been entirely voluntary system that lets companies do three things to monitor the networks to identify cyberindicators and use Counter Measures acanthus cyberthreats and to share in receiving information with each other with federal, state, and local government. Companies will use the authority to monitor and share information to provide full Liability Protection for themselves as long as they do so within the bills parameters and those are clearly spelled out. The bill has a number of protections to make sure the government is the use information for any purpose other than its ever security. And requires a director of National Intelligence to put in place of process of sharing information on it cybert
Without ever doing that. And so i literally would do things that started to build relationships. You want something to fall back on when you disagree on the issues. When mike says something and youre sitting across the table. You know, i know mike and his value set. There is something to fall back on. I see the same thing in board rooms for corporations. If they come in periodically to my you are not apt to get a very effective outcome. I think that is huge. The strategy part is not that hard. Figuring out what to do i think you can do on a saturday morning. Let me just add to that. That. I think this is critical for damn near anything. Part of what we have to do is take a big step back and look at the relationships and the way we have had those relationships over the last 30, 40, 50 years and say, are those relationships still solid, sound . Do we have to form new relationships . Do we have to change the way we relate to each other . And this is not just in afghanistan but throughout