a missile but actually about the state responsibility, about russia s role, and crucially, ultimately, about vladimir putin s role. this now will be a chance forjudges to explore exactly that. and of course, russia has always denied any responsibility. i spoke to michael bociurkiw former spokesperson for the special monitoring mission to ukraine of the organization for security and co operation in europe. he witnessed the mh17 crash aftermath and told me about his role in the investigation process. our role as the osc special monitoring mission was to facilitate access for investigators. we arrived on the crash scene in less than 24 hours, actually, after it happened, and it was still smouldering, there were bodies and debris all over the place. but i have to say, in the lead up to us actually being deployed to the area, there was a meeting at the osc with the russian ambassador, and this
was hit by a missile in 2014. the dutch government argues moscow failed to investigate the incident, when the malaysia airlines flight was hit by a missile in 2014. the dutch government argues moscow failed to investigate the incident, and the subsequent disinformation about russia s role violated the relatives human rights. the bbc s anna holligan has spent the day in the hague: the court has decided this case is admissible despite the fact that russia had argued that the netherlands has missed the timeframe to apply to the european court of human rights and had not fully explored the legal options inside russia. so this is a huge blow to russia because now this court will be exploring state responsibility. this is the first time an international court will look at state responsibility in the case of mh 17. first let s recap what happened with flight mh17. the boeing 777 was en route from amsterdam to kuala lumpur when it was hit by a russian
government argues that they failed to investigate the incident and the subsequent disinformation about russia s rule, violates the relative human rights. they spent the day in the headache. the court has decided this case is admissible despite the fact that russia argues that the netherlands has missed the time frame to apply to the court of human rights and is not fully exploit the legal options inside russia. this is a huge blow to russia because now, this court will be exploring state responsibility and this is the first time an international court will look at state responsibility in the case of mh 17. let s recap what happened to the flight mh17. the boeing 77 was on the way to amsterdam to quadruple into it was hit in the plane went down in the