like none of us could really understand. all he is surrounded by is the kardashians and a bunch of yes men and in the fashion world. he doesn t understand what s happening in the streets, what s happening when it comes to protests. none of that. laura: wait a second. as if there aren t multimillionaire african-americans, latinos, and others living in beller, brent, malibu. because you don t live on the streets, then you can t comment on anything? odd bringing in the kardashians. what was going on with that comment question mexico wasn t a very smart comment. a salacious argument that could be attacked a thousand different ways. to suggest that because somebody is money they can t think or they don t have any knowledge or facts or data makes entirely no sense. in fact, you could argue that they may have more access to things. after that just incredibly low i.q. was when it comes down to. at the end of the day, these radio hosts are not the great philosophers of our time. they do they
the relationship sort of overpower it. as long as people of good faith are running the two countries, i think you can find that we ll work together seamlessly as richard haas just described. we are so integrated that we really don t export and import. we make things together. the average car that s manufactured, so-called, in detroit, actually crosses the border with ontario about seven times. so we ve got a very integrated economy in north america. remember, the nafta agreement really was the canada/u.s. free trade agreement with mexico hung on the back. that may have been a little premature. mexico wasn t a developed economy at the time, didn t have the kind of social or governmental institutions necessary to collaborate in that three-party agreement. so a renegotiation or a redo of nafta is not totally illogical. it was negotiated before the