Deny any of your fellow americans the right to vote in this country. [applause] there is no issue of states rights or national rights. There is only the struggle for human rights. [applause] i have not the slightest doubt what will be your answer. The last time a president sent a civil rights bill to the congress, it contained a provision to protect Voting Rights in federal elections. That civil rights bill was passed after eight long months of debate. When that built into my desk from the congress for my signature, the heart of the voting provision had been eliminated. This time, on this issue, there must be no delay or no hesitation, or no compromise without purpose. [applause] we cannot, we must not, refuse to protect the right of every american to vote in every election he may desire to participate in. [applause] and we cannot and must not wait another eight months before we get a bill. [applause] we have already waited 100 years and more. And the time for waiting is gone. [applaus
Way to move the ball forward. Other members of the panel i dont know if anyone would like to comment on the clarity of the language. I would say while we recognize the preventy of it to simply say, go act reasonably, thats a negligent standard. Were all under a duty to act reasonably in our daily lives and not be negligent. When youre facing a threat of this nature, to have the congress say, hey, act reasonably, i think thats underwhemg as a standard and expectation as we enter the age of cyber battles. I would agree, particularly when youve got a road map thats worked for 16 years in another industry that you can lean on. Id like to talk a little bit about how unreasonable delay works in the real world. Theres talk about whether a notice should be immediate could you put some specific time frame on when a reasonable notice would occur. Could anyone on the Panel Comment on whether its realistic to require a company to notify consumers within a specific set of days . I think the challen
Insurgents started happening after the iraq war and you have a lot of sunni individuals who came to kuwait at the time that were displaced in the conflict that happened. And i think that they have a lot of influence actually and as he said, kuwait has open politics and there has been some situations. And they actually broke down in the middle of these issues and what escalation was part of sm and also in lebanon as well. And this includes the parliamentarians in their support for them as well which i think tells you something about how the sectarian policies of the region are becoming much more prominent and syria takes that too much higher level. And everyone actually has their own players and a lot of the fears that were built up from these other things than that includes what it means and they have their own actors and it will now be a part of another foreign setting. Its just as we talked about. And i think the problem in kuwait is that the politics are much more open. At the same
Stories. Im going each panellest briefly. Well start with questions. Nicole goodwin all the way down at the end, enlisted in the u. S. Army in 2001. She served as a supply specialist and was deployed in iraq in july of 2003 for five 1 2 months. When nicole returned to the bronx was one of the first Homeless Veterans of iraq war and featured in the document, when i came home as well as many news programs. She lives in new york city and raising her daughter and wrying poetry, fiction and nonfiction. She graduated college in 2000 one with a ba in english in creative writing an anthropology teresa fazio, next to nicole, grew up in white plains, new york. She served as a Marine Corps Communications officer from 2002 to 2006. Deploying once to iraq. She is writing a memoir about deployment relationship and its aftermath. Teresa published her work in New York Times at war blog and read her writing at the Kennedy Center in washington, d. C. She lives and works in new york city ing rebecca hari
Expect because of that. A question on nuclear if i may. Based on what you said, is it correct to surmise that your forecast for nuclear includes no additional new construction . No additional new construction. There are couple of plants that are already under construction. There are four, and there are one or two more [indiscernible] but i think it is probably fair to say that you are not going to see a huge increase in the overall capacity numbers for nuclear, that new growth is going to be just about enough to offset the retirement. It adds a little bit. I think those numbers last year we had nuclear expanding by a little bit and i think this year we have nuclear contracting by a little bit. A question on Carbon Dioxide emissions figure. I think you said we are down nine percent now from the 2005 peak. Im just curious why 2005 was a peak year, considering it was two or three years before the economic downturn. What caused emissions to decline from 2006 onward . It seems almost like t