here just a few moments ago, what is your reaction to this? well, i believe what all th really good lawyers that are o the network, that it means tha they are close to an indictment i do have a couple o questions. and i will never find out but, did they coordinate this at al with the feds so they knew i was coming because we keep hearing othe cases are also close the other thing is, whil people are saying that it won hurt donald trump in the primary, i think that should h be indicted, his numbers are going to tank for the general. and if they are bad enough, rev, as i said on the revenues, i don t think he will make it to the ballot come 2024 when, eta trump said just last weekend he will stay in the race even if he is indicted many democrats would like to see him held accountable but could criminal charges i this case be just another wa to rally up his face it could be
Technology policy and media-monitoring organizations warn that Trump’s return to Meta platforms will lead to a surge of misinformation and discrimination against marginalized communities.
presidents will get into the habit of just releasing the private records of their predecessors if they are of a different party in order to embarrass them. that s actually not a crazy thing to say. the d.c. circuit said no prosec president will do that. if i release the records of my predecessor then my successor will release my records. that might be right. you can imagine if donald trump becomes president and heaven forbid and there were a republican congress that were subpoenaing records that belong to biden, trump might say go ahead. if the justices took that concern seriously then maybe they would consider the issue. i think the odds are they will be satisfied with this. the court also pointed out it s not just the current president. it s congress also which wants it. it s two branches of government to the argument the presser was
me. source telling cnn the context of the text messages and e-mails handed over by the president s former chief of staff, mark meadows without any claim of executive privilege. meadows, as we reported last night is now refusing to talk to the committee and suing the members along with the house speakers. there s a lot to get to. we ll have more on what meadows shared in a moment. let s get details on the piappes court ruling. this was 68 pages in a wholesale rejection of trump s arguments that he should block records from going to the committee. the judge writing this opinion wrote repeatedly ta trump s legal team failed to make any compelling arguments in this case and instead she says they
assessment. the committee now one step closer to getting their hands on what is hundreds of payments of d documents. that includes call logs and drafts of speeches and handwritten notes. trump s team do get time to appeal this to the supreme court. however, if the court decides not to take up this case, those documents would then be released to the committee. what does the former president have to say? trump s team were quick to respond on twitter. they said they will take this to the supreme court and a spokesperson for trump said this case was always destined for the supreme court. his duty to defend the constitution and the office of the presidency continues. as this appeals court pointed out, trump s team, they really gave no real reasons why these documents shouldn t be released. only that it s trump s