objections that could hold up the publication process and definitely, because there may be a legal challenge. if not, it will be finalised and published in the coming days. we expect more likely tuesday or wednesday. and that will be then the end of a very long process and the publication of what was intended to be the official, internal government verdict on what has become known as the partygate saga. there are some unknowns about how much evidence will be republished. there is something close to 500 photos and they will be other evidence as well, message exchanges, e mail chains, how much of that will be in the end labour said it all needs to be published in the report for people to have confidence in this process. there is the detail and the findings themselves. just how damning will they be? it will be uncomfortable reading for the prime minister and
the lawyer says cukushner is in compliance with all laws and rules. and for bloomberg news and cnn political analyst is with us. as we look at this, part of what the pushback was, saying that, yes, he s in compliance because in some cases from what we understand he would screen shot those message exchanges and then forward the screen shot of that messaging to his white house e-mail account, which seems like a somewhat unnecessary extra step on one hand and also is questionable, perhaps, in terms of recordkeeping. sure. erica, there s a trust me aspect to that, but also when you re using something that s encrypted but not the government s version of encrypted it raises concerns from the intelligence community and kind of from u.s. officials, trying to understand what was happening. so i think what we have here is a combination of the obvious politics for democrats, which is that during the campaign season
president have in common is a philosophy that you deny everything. that only suckers and losers admit to anything. if you deny, it did not happen. i testified fully and truthfully to the house intelligence committee and turned over the wiki leaks direct message exchanges. laura: how did you get in touch with them? by going to direct messages. based on the context and the timing it was 6 weeks after wiki leak all right published the dnc disclosures. so collusion is impossible. they are benign. i turned them over to the committee. laura: intel has it. the senate intelligence committee will have it. laura: you wanted to testify
do. one thing that roger stone and the president have in common is a philosophy that you deny everything. that only suckers and losers admit to anything. if you deny it, it didn t happen. first of all i testified fully and truthfully to the house intelligence committee and i turned over to them the wikileaks and guccifer direct message exchanges. how do you get in touch with guccifer 2.0? by going to direct messages. based on the content and the context of that exchanges it s six weeks after the wikileaks exposures. so collusion is impossible. they are expost fashion toe. they are benign and i turned them over to the committee. laura: the house committee has it. the senate committee will