The animals were found on private land along Howarth Creek by Merritt, where they became trapped as the landowner did not want beavers on their property.
for what race we are, of course i think that is problematic. that is not fair or equal. it is interesting to see some of the critics of this opinion coming out on, against, clarence thomas saying here is a guy that benefitted from affirmative action. he would not be there if it wasn t for this and now he is against it and this is precisely the problem, right? there is an assumption that he got through the court through affirmative action. i talked to my daughter that went to the computer of chicago and she says that her and other minority students get that look like you got in because of that. i think that minorities want to get in based on their merritt merit. i mentioned this in the interview that we had is that i think this is an opportunity to see what are the root props for why there is such an achievement
counter parts. we need to stop what the racism of low expectations. that s what these race-based initiatives do. they have such a low opinion. so we need to refocus at the college level back on the idea of merritt and scholarship. if we continue down the path where race is the deciding factor, well, then we diminish the value of a college education. we diminish the value of our own profession. this isn t the 1960s america that they pretent we re living in. neil: the only reason why i started that question to you, that is going to be the means by which i glean from harvard s response to this that they will judge future students and who they re admitted or not and that the essay plays an important role and that essay is an opportunity for someone to talk about their life experiences, maybe to infer special race conditions, if you will. that is something that no doubt the supreme court will keep track of the number of kids