but watch and i ll get you there. when you start turning around lawyers with the defendants that are defending the clients. we start to live in a fascist state. that is not much of a defense? ? he served as trump s attorney during the election. do you expect that he s going to vote the fifth amendment? or a sequel to argue attorney-client privilege as so many have done? i think is going to invoke any privilege he can pick up. realistically, has been told he s a target, he should. it ll be foolhardy to go in there and answer questions. i think he will try attorney-client privilege, which is, i think dubious. because it does not apply to conversations that are in furtherance of a crime. i think he will take the fifth he has to. look, it is his right to do so, and is he said there are investigations swirling around. there came this moment late last week where we are so deep in mar-a-lago discussion, which remains important, but at one point on thursday night he said ther
doesn t seem like we were doing the january 6th hearings. it seems like a lifetime ago, that stuff is not gone away. that will come back in georgia, that will come back with doj, that will come back with congress. this is not. let s talk about the justice department and the probable cause, right. you are saying about this affidavit secret. they say, they re trying to keep the affidavits secret i should say. this was the response. it is a disclosure of this juncture of the affidavit supporting probable cause would, by contrast, causing if you get an irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation. so, bottom line, they are not done. what s stands out in this response to you that they keep saying we don t want this in public? this, as he was considering, merck robin was city us opposite theo j. considering whether or not to push for the unsealing of the warrant and of course the property receipt. this is exactly the slippery slope he did not want to end up on. now here he i