there are significant questions. the review, co authored by the royal couege co authored by the royal college of psychiatrists, the owner of the journal that published the paper also found that methodological problems brought into question coleman s results. we should say not all the reaction was negative. the journal s 2011 editor felt that despite the flaws it was important to have the paper s viewpoint expressed. when we have approached professor coleman for comment she resized her long experience in publishing and sharing results. she argued there are no hard and fast rules for these and her work met recommendations. but with research still influencing american healthcare influencing american healthca re influencing american healthcare in 2022, scientists have complained ii in 2022, scientists have complained 11 years earlier a concern. ., complained 11 years earlier a concern. . , , ., concern. having deeply flawed menu scripts concern. having deeply flawed menu scripts in con