The bus. We worked on a dude ranch in the local immunity. I got to know many of these men quite well. What i began to realize is, most of them had served in vietnam and we even had a few who had served in korea. And how when they came home, they began this journey of disconnection from their families and their communities. I just knew we could do better. I had had personal experience. My dad served in the pacific in world war ii. Served in korea. And how when they came home, they began this journey of disconnection from their families and their communities. I just knew we could do better. I had had personal experience. My dad served in the pacific in world war ii. Like others of his generation, he never talked about that. Never. Not a word. Nor did any of my uncles that had served or my friends parents. But it had taken a toll on him emotionally and physically. I did not understand that until years later. Now, obviously, we know better, but we also know the statistics, right . We know
It is opposed because it might be a wedge crop that would somehow get people gmos gmos used to the idea of. Get people used to the idea of gmos. Lets think about what really is a danger. I can assure you that the issue is not how something was made. It is what was actually made and whether it is safe or not. The danger is not and i will tell you with the background is in a moment. Maybe some of you can guess. But the danger is in food that is actually being engineered or being creative by very wellmeaning scientists. You can say they are misguided, but they are trying to do something. As far as the testing occurs, there is no testing on nongmo crops with a variety of process, genetic alterations, all of the crops that we have today are not the natural original crop. Basically, not only is there a great deal of testing, its voluntary. You dont think you want to be affected by it. Just eat food is labeled it is not gmo. Stick to organic foods. It will help your health anyway not to read
Congress is also in recess. Lawmakers returning next monday. We will have live coverage of the house and senate next week. Thanks for joining us for this thursday edition of washington journal. Enjoy the rest of your day. Life programming today on cspan includes a discussion on mentalhealth or rams Health Programs for military personnel. From the National Council of Behavioral Health. At noon, the American Enterprise institute unveils a report on al qaeda and u. S. Security in the wake of the killing of dozens of suspected al qaeda fighters over the weekend in yemen. 30 a look at elections in afghanistan. As. Is live on cspan tonight at 8 00 p. M. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is joined by colleagues and friends from canada and israel. They sure what it took to rise above the odds to reach the top of their fields. Heres some of what you will see. Judges dont make agendas. Always. Eceiving, we dont make the controversies that come before us. When they arebest on our plate to decide them. Not like
Thats where you may see an agenda. My question really is, i know in the united eight we have places inre judges are elected. Canada and israel, are there some judges and Court Systems where there is an election . Are you kidding . I remember in judgment at nuremberg there is a scene where Marlena Dietrich is walking with spencer tracy. I love movies. Oscar night for me is a religious night. She said, this is your country . I remember it was so odd the notion that you are directly responsive to the public for the decisions where you have to choose a side that may not be the one giving you the money. Who do you go to for fund raising . Im not saying there are very good judges who are elected. Theory ofg about the an election where you are directly responsible to the majority for decisionmaking. , ifou are doing sentencing you are doing constitutional rights, you are having to decide a minority versus a majority interest, and if you really like hearing a judge and you want to go back for
For a reception and appear in front of 500 people in a room speech, itpublic should be recorded and theres no good reason why we should had to cede to his request that it not be recorded. Why did you . He wouldnt have come otherwise. On these remarks, its selfevident that they are thatrent in the sense other than justice kagan, theyve come from one cloistered life to another. To the priesthood is through the federal appellate these institutions are bundled up so when they get to the Supreme Court, they dont range of professions and exposures in public life that other Government People would have by the time they got high rung. Youre saying theyre different because they have super thin skin . Not because no, its because theyre transparency is not a technical issue or a legal cultural issue. When transparency is a technical issue, it fails, it almost always fails. If you look at the president s open government agenda, when the president on day one was like were going to open up all of. G