serving time. the proceeds would go to rape victims including his own. he tweeted in 2013 about sexual assaults in the military and he said what did these geniuses expect when they put men and women together ? his explanation for the rape i guess is that blaming the women? if you put women in the military with men of course there will be rape? i don t know men are such brutes the sight of a woman in combat will precipitate rape or whether it is the women s fault for wanting to fight alongside men. i can t figure that one out. your piece pointed out he took out full-page ads in new york newspapers on the central park jogger case saying those suspects should get the death penalty. they were convicted. they were all then later released many years later when the evidence indicated they didn t do it.
about illegal immigrants coming in and raping everyone, we decide what is he your piece begins with that framework with what he said about rape with mexican immigrants and you point out other comments he s made about rape in the past. you point out it was his idea that when mike tyson was convicted of rape he should be able to buy way out of jail, hand over money to rape victims instead of serving time. the proceeds would go to rape victims including his own. he tweeted in 2013 about sexual assaults in the military and he said, what did these geniuses expect when they put men and women together ? his explanation for the rape, i guess is that blaming the women? if you put women in the military with men of course there will be rape? i don t know men are such brutes the sight of a woman in combat will precipitate rape or whether it is the women s fault
asking her, you know, to consider something else. we know where she stands. she has shown us her cards. we know who she is now and where she stands. so we can go ahead and start working on some other some other strategies that will actually bring, you know, men and women together who have been abused by the military and come up with some other strategy that will work. as you know, those who support the mccaskill bill say that the data does not indicate that outside prosecutors are more likely to crack down on people who rape or sexually assault others in the military than the chain of command. when you say the data is with you, the numbers are with you, are you talking about people being more likely to report it? is that what you re talking about? i m saying across the board, we do have more people coming forward saying this is happening to them because they perceive something is going to change. on the flip side of that, we have people who are, you know, on the other end of it w
these cases highlight what chuck hagel recently called a stain on the honor of millions of military men and women. it s also why new york democratic senator kirsten gillibrand pushed hard to pass a bill that would let military lawyers instead of commanders to handle sex assault cases. the belief is it makes victims less likely to come forward. but the bill failed to get the votes it needed to avoid a filibuster this week with some republicans and democrats insisting it would cause more harm than good to take these cases outside the chain of command. the argument was posed its victims versus commander, whose side are you on? and it s not that simple. and if you take the time to really get into the complexities of the military justice system and how these cases are handled, i m confident that the choice the senate made today is the right one for victims of sexual assault in the military. that was claire mccaskill of missouri. live from atlanta is former army
sandberg clone. a lot of people cannot do what she did. there are worse things. you take what you can get out of it and use what s relevant to your own life. if everybody can take a been step forward, the world would be a better place. is it a movement? we consider it a community, and the goal is bringing men and women together. of the 62,000, how many are men? i don t know the number on that we ve had a lot of interest from men, and not just doing it because it s altruistic. we want to do better things for women. they are doing it, because self-servingly, we will do better if we draw from the whole population. more balanced teams are more effective and more balanced households are happier. interesting. and anybody with a daughter would say i have a vested interest in not seeing my daughter dealing with some of the things my spouse is dealing with. the book is a great read. i ve enjoyed it.