insists the words could not did he taken down and stricken from the record saying the rules don t apply here because mr. burk is merely appearing as a staffer. but later chairman nadler stated the opposite and deck liared he was is a peering to represent the report as the representative which means the member rules should allow. and then mr. burk was allowed to trade places from witness to questioner and it is consistent with this whole impeachment circus. as everybody knows intel chairman adam schiff was allowed in the opening act of the circus to serve as the judge, jury, prosecutor, witness coach and case strategy chief all in one. so much for due process. under the democrats haphazardly drawn special parameters for house resolution 660 mr. burk was allowed to join members of the congress on die sass and ask questions of mr. castor. when he was argumentative and
chairman nadler insisted those words could not be taken down and stricken from the record saying the rules don t apply because mr. burke is appearing as a staff. but later, he stated they opposite and declared that he was preparing to present the democrat members report as a representative which would of course mean the member rules should apply. then mr. burke was allowed to switch places and turn from witness to question her, that is extraordinarily bizarre of course but entirely consistent with this whole impeachment circus. as everybody knows, intel chairman adam schiff was allowed in the opening activist circuits for judge, jury, prosecutor, witness, coach, and case strategy chief all-in-one. so much for due were due process. after they haphazardly drawn special parameters, house resolution 660, mr. burke was then allowed to join the elected members of congress on this dais and ask 45 minutes of questions of his fellow witness mr. castor. when he was argumentative, assumed critica