I dont know how many times ms. Jordan has recused herself as a board member. I know that supervisor avalos asked for that information a few days ago. This chronicle article referenced other allegations. I dont really have any information to verify that or speak to it. And i know that for elected officials and others, the section 1090 of the government codes requires limitations. Section 1090 would apply to a commissioner. The political reform act would require her to recuse herself if shes making a decision in her role as a board member that would impact her own financial holdings. An as always, my office works with every board member who want to figure out when to recuse themselves. I know there are times when recusal may be necessary for any of us, but many times when a recusal could invalidate the decision of the agency, is there that risk here . The law that you referenced, Government Code Section 1090 is the law that sometimes requires commissioners to step down. It would only req
Hope you continue to raise concerns, but i think this is a fairly routine parcel map approval and i dont find merit in supporting the appeal. My moek motion will be to amend item 43, the language in the title, striking the word appeal from title and the first line so the first line would read motion of approving public works mixed new construction so i move that we amend item 43. All right, supervisor mar has made a motion to correct the title through an amendment seconded by supervisor campos. Without objection the amendment stand and i move that we adopt madam president , item 43 as amended and table items 44 and 45. Motion made bid supervisor mar and seconded by campos. Can we take that same house same call. Without objection the motion is approved and the tentative map for 3032 and 3038 through 3040 clement street is upheld. At this time if we can go to our next special order 3 00 pm. First we need to go to item 43. 63. Item 63 is a convene [inaudible] at 3 00 pm to hold a public h
Ticking and if the board rejects it the appointee loses the seat. It understand it doesnt its counterintuitive, but thats the way the charter raze. Reads. In this case the special meeting on january 7, but that would be your last day. Now, there have a number of allegations made in terms of non compliance with ethical requirements and we heard free the retirement board, sort of their at least the executive directors view as to the question of incompatible activities. Does the City Attorneys Office have an opinion as to whether or not this individual has complied with all the ethical requirements under state law . I can only speak to what i know based on the public filings and conversation with ms. Jordan. As supervisor avalos mentioned, the executive director of the retirement board received a complaint that ms. Jordan had accepted an investment while a member of the retirement board where the company had granted her the ability to invest even though her amount was below the threshold.
Decide either way depending on their interpretation of that. Thats right. Theres an matter of ethics. They could dismiss it, preach a settlement where she could pay monetary penalties, or hold a public hearing leading to a determination. What is the amount of the penalties here . Under the charter and local ethics law, the Ethics Commission has the ability to impose fines for up to 5000 for each violation. It takes into account all sorts of factors in determining the penalty they apply. Besides the specific ethical requirements that apply to this agency, are there any other sections of the government code or common law that would apply to a determination of whether or not there was compliance with ethical requirements . Arising out of this gmo transaction, its possible. Im not entirely sure that ms. Jordan could have a conflict if in agreement with gmo comes before the retirement board in her the future. I understand the last time the retirement board approved an agreement with gmo was
Transaction, its possible. Im not entirely sure that ms. Jordan could have a conflict if in agreement with gmo comes before the retirement board in her the future. I understand the last time the retirement board approved an agreement with gmo was Something Like 20 years ago. I dont know how many times ms. Jordan has recused herself as a board member. I know that supervisor avalos asked for that information a few days ago. This chronicle article referenced other allegations. I dont really have any information to verify that or speak to it. And i know that for elected officials and others, the section 1090 of the government codes requires limitations. Section 1090 would apply to a commissioner. The political reform act would require her to recuse herself if shes making a decision in her role as a board member that would impact her own financial holdings. An as always, my office works with every board member who want to figure out when to recuse themselves. I know there are times when rec