suggests he did. is he in trouble? the house ethics are pretty deferential to members of congress provided there was no exchange of money, he didn t accept a bribe which hasn t been reported or wasn t tied to a campaign contribution, which look, it may have been, based on what we know rudy giuliani s associates. shy of that, the only rule is a broad one on members of congress that they act on behalf of the house, they do in the bring ill repute upon the house. you can make the case, democrats could, that nunes owed a duty to divulge this. he had a conflict. that would require the house ethics committee to admonish him. you will see a member file a condemnation resolution and get a vote on the house floor. do you see it coming up and answering some of these questions? no, absolutely not. you know him.