Item. 9, update on pedestrian signals. Information item. Chief deputy. Melita. Im here to give a brief presentation you should have. At the july meeting, which was very timely, we funded a lot of pedestrian signals from prop k and proposed from prop aa. The commissioner asked to speak to. The goal to speak to the city and how they are prioritized. [ indiscernible ] thank you for coming in and responding to that request in the last transit and programs meeting. It is important to get in terms of our showing equitable distribution of the count down signals. Appreciate your time. Melita velasco. Im here to provide an over view with the count down signal projects within the city to. Briefly touch upon the status of the signal installation, the city is a pioneer in terms of the count down signals. We started in 2000. I understand new york started in 2011, just last year that. Is something we are very proud of and continue to do this rewarding and safetyrelated work. Our goal is to add these
if they are ready to go, they are funded first. there are strict projects on the line. if like in prop k if we have programs in the fifth year and the sponsor doesn t come in the board can say you have a good story, we will let your funds rollover or could program them to other eligibility projects ready to go. the timing is also very good. we are about to embark this year on an update of the five-year priorityization programs, covering fiscal year 14-15, the next five. that is picking up the tail of prop a. we will be able to complement in two categories, the biggest opportunity are the rt, tps category and prop k where we can have the ability to advance a lot of funds if there are projects ready to go. same thing on street repair. may be able to advance funds to backfill the projects. thank you. colleagues, any other comments or questions? commissioner kim? i apologize for being away from the meeting. could you discuss maybe you already went over there through vario
street pavement recommendation. for those watching and you on page 96, attachment 5 with mini project description, you can add to this if you need, from market to division and bryant from 18th to division streets. we probably need to change the project name so it is a little more descriptive. okay. division and what? i don t have it. on market. ninth from market to division and on bryant street, from 18th to division street. okay. that will explain. in terms of the tep i think the placeholder is essential. the tp under eir is about six months under schedule. it is a big undertaking, something we are very supportive of. but one of the messages to the voters was we want to deliver the projects. if they are ready to go, they are funded first. there are strict projects on the line. if like in prop k if we have programs in the fifth year and the sponsor doesn t come in the board can say you have a good story, we will let your funds rollover or could program them to other
street on 19th at teraval, that sort of thing. that signal gives an individual like myself enough time to safely cross the streets. some of these other intersections i get in half lane of traffic. the stop sign goes up and starts telling me i have to rush the street. sometimes we have nine seconds to cross the street that. is nothing. as far as the aa, i worked in that edition and i strongly urge you to approve it. thank you very much. thank you. are there any members of the public who like to comment? seeing none, we will close public comment. so this is just the draft presentation so we will have the decisions before us later this year. but i want to make sure we follow up on some of the concerns around linking, especially around pedestrian improvements to the real concerns that are out there around pedestrian safety, where the high injury areas, making sure we are doing homework on that, as i m sure the ta is doing. colleagues, any other comments or questions? okay. we c
areas that are of high concern. the one we looked at was through the priorityization criteria specific to that category. we give priority to projects identified the through the walk first effort, or that may be identified as corridors, projects or inter dictions through successor efforts, given what they have given consideration to date. i m looking at this chart. these are total funds we are talking about in terms of fiscal year 2012-2013. part is double a funds. we don t have that much funds that are here. the overall available funds, if you add up all three, that is what we anticipate being able to program out in prap aa dollars, including 12-13. if we had enough in 12-13 to we do. after understanding our revenues in terms of what was projected in the expenditure and seing from the department of motorvehicles, putting that together, these are funds being able to program out in given years by cash flow. not on the programming side. that is clear. so if you have yo