nors donors. we make history available through our library that provides access to our amazing collection which includes close to 14 million manuscript pages and among other things the papers of three of the first six u.s. presidents. we also do this through programs for educators, programs for academics and through our public programs. we also host exhibitions and tonight s talk really kochtails with our current show which is title fire, voices from the boston massacre. this ex-legislation is looks out he residents of boston experienced the events and ramifications march 5, 1770 and tried hard in this presentation not only to talk about john adams and thomas hutchinson and the regular citizen of boston and how this moment of violence impacted their lives. our speaker,. h. breen is doing the same thing but for the entire american revolution this. book the will of the people explores role of citizens and cities throughout the 13 colonies during the war and looks at the s
And recovery. The morning. Good morning. Welcome to our panel on columbia burning a sesquicentennial reappraisal. My name is don doyle. I will make a few introductory remarks. I want to thank robin waits for all they did to make this such a success. Not just this panel, but the entire event. I think it has been a wonderful example of how to commemorate a painful episode in this citys history. Thanks especially to jessica whose idea it was to do something for this commemoration. We met over lunch, and from there it grew. We partnered with Historic Columbia. Sponsoring this event also is the History Center at the university of South Carolina. Another contributor was the graduate school at the university of South Carolina. Think all of you for your help and support. We brought for scholars four scholars together. We are beating almost exactly at the time, 150 years ago, that the union troops were crossing the river and coming towards the city, toward that moment at 10 00 in the morning wh
I want to thank those for all they did to make this such a success. Not just this panel, but the entire event. I think it has been a wonderful example of how to commemorate a painful episode in this citys history. Thanks especially to jessica whose idea it was to do something for this commemoration. We met over lunch, and from there it grew. We partnered with Historic Columbia. Sponsoring this event also is the History Center at the university of South Carolina. Another contributor was the graduate school at the university of South Carolina. Thank all of you for your help and support. We brought four scholars together. We are meeting almost exactly at the time, 150 years ago, that the union troops were crossing the river and coming towards the city, toward that moment at 10 00 in the morning when the city was formerly surrendered. We are meeting right here on market street. I am not an expert on this event in civil war history. I have written a book on the civil war called the cause of
Had they were looking at something that it meant nothing to them as we were able to locate and find. It was not they were totally unaware of the issues concerning the switch not deploying any aspect of it. One individual who did know all of the facts and had that information was mr. Degiorgio. The other engineers who were on the email train it meant nothing to them. So, theres an email im holding it here. On your report. It discusses implementation of the new page 102 and the footnote. I believe thats right the quote is increased torque forces to be within specifications and it was sent to five gm employees on june 2nd, 2006. But we have also obtained another document that was not included in your report and this document indicates that another gm contract engineer may have approved the 2006 change. Its a production part a approval process report obtained by delphi through gms global quality tracking system. It is dated june 1st, 2006, and it lists gm supplier quality engineer. A gm su
It so requires. Dont be fooled, she said. Only the Supreme Court so required. The federal arbitration act was never meant to produce this outcome. In the hands of todays majority, arbitration threatens to become more nearly the opposite, a mechanism easily made to block the vindication of meritorious federal claims and insulate wrongdoers from liability. The court thus undermines the federal arbitration act no less than it does the sherman act and other federal statutes providing rights of action. So, commissioner wright, in your written testimony you argue that the courts should set the rules of the road for internet openness through antitrust law. But how could a complaint of anticompetitive behavior even reach the courts if its lawful to force every consumer, Small Business and employee to arbitrate their claims in a foreign venue that is secret, thats for profit. Youre familiar with the arbitration process . No jury trial, no right to appe appeal. How does your opinion about how th