1.3 million people could lose their addiction or opioid coverage if the medicaid expansion is killed. i don t see to see it killed. i think if the republicans come back and say let s keep it, let s make it more efficient, let s make it more topdown with our medicaid czar, i think they will win over some democratic votes and this thing will pass. heather: probably 70 million americans on medicaid as well. in the senate where have you 20 republican senators in 31 states that have medicaid expansion, then you will get everybody on board. heather: well, we have to wrap it up. i also like what have you to say healthcare insurance is not healthcare, very important. very important. thank you for pointing that out. heather: jon? jon: new developments to tell you about in the fight against isis. [explosion] jon: you are looking at iraqi troops pushing further in one the strongholds. details on their strategic gains ahead. bp engineered a fleet of 32 brand new ships
this is before we get to phase two or phase three. heather: some of what he is talking about in that cbo report although the good part of it said that $337 billion in a reduction in the federal deficit over the next 10 years but it predicted that 24 million fewer people would have coverage for a decade from now if the aca stays intact. uninsured jump to 14 million after the first year a lot of those on medicaid. offer more choice. catastrophic options. maybe more young people will buy. in 45% right now are taking the penalty. in terms of medicaid, i want to keep the expansion. i would like to see the republicans throw that as an olive branch. that will get rid of a democratic talking point 24 million are losing their insurance. the head for medicaid and medicare services the medicaid czar she has efficiency programs that have worked in indiana, bridge to jobs programs. premium pay. more efficient. heather: how do you pay for it? pay less if it s more efficient.
recklessly irresponsible as democrats and spent money and prided themselves for not having raised taxes, but what they actually did was the same thing, which is not balance the budget. we ve got to go to another topic. we ve got a new medicare, medicaid czar he s going to run cms. basically one of the biggest positions in the government. democrat senator max baucus had a problem with the fact that the president made an interim appointment. a recess appointment. therefore, there was no hearing. welcome, sure, i mean, congress lovers to have control of these things and presidents always resisted at both parties, but is it surprising to anyone that the president would pick someone to run medicare and medicaid who supports the president s policies on medicare and medicaid? isn t it the health care is in fact a redistribution of wealth. we have progressive tax. caroline. all of the programs are redistribution of wealth. homeless programs, any federal program that you re talking a
democrats and spent money and prided themselves for not having raised taxes, but what they actually did was the same thing, which is not balance the budget. we ve got to go to another topic. we ve got a new medicare, medicaid czar he s going to run cms. basically one of the biggest positions in the government. democrat senator max baucus had a problem with the fact that the president made an interim appointment. a recess appointment. therefore, there was no hearing. welcome, sure, i mean, congress lovers to have control of these things and presidents always resisted at both parties, but is it surprising to anyone that the president would pick someone to run medicare and medicaid who supports the president s policies on medicare and medicaid? isn t it the health care is in fact a redistribution of wealth. we have progressive tax. caroline. all of the programs are redistribution of wealth. homeless programs, any federal program that you re talking about where people like you a
republicans have been as irresponsible as democrats because they spend money and pride themselves on not raising taxes but what they did was the same thing, which is not balance the budget. we have to go to another topic. new medicare/medicaid czar who is going to run cms. it s basically one of the biggest positions in the government. democratic senator max baucus had a problem with the fact the president made interim appointment so there was no hearing. congress loves to have control of these things and the president resist it at both parties. is it surprising to anyone that the president would pick someone to run medicare and medicaid who supports the president s policy on medicare and medicaid? mike: didn t he said healthcare is a redistribution of wealth? all programs are a redistribution of wealth. homeless programs, any federal program that you are talking about where people like you and i can afford to pay more in taxes to supplement people who can t afford it. of course,