he was supposed to be armed and dangerous. they found no weapons at all and he was passive. the money they found was not even in daron wint s vehicle. if he committed murder for money, why wouldn t he have the money with him? they ve got the wrong guy. it s a media feeding frenzy. they are trying the case he is not guilty of any crime he s presumed innocent. you have represented him as i understand it in at least six previous cases. he has a criminal record that is fairly extensive convicted of assault in 2009 pled guilty on other charges in 2010 other minor charges as well pled guilty to malicious destruction of property. he does not sound like a good dude. why do you continue to get on television and defend him so
but critics wonder whether to trust that answer, whether her way was a deliberate strategy to delay or defy legitimate requests for documents about taxpayer business and whether her way puts sensitive materials at higher risk of hacking. so ron fournier, you ve covered clintons for a long time. team clinton says, listen, you re blowing this out of proportion. it s a media feeding frenzy. critics say, we don t know zsh. it s not critics say, it s anybody with a brain in their head and isn t in the tank for the clintons. this is a very clear violation of the regulations. it s a very clear violation of the spirit of the regulation. those are our e-mails. she never should have tried to skirt it. it s not even a matter of debate. this is an issue she s created. it s an issue she can solve. i ll go back. let s go way back to two weeks ago to the foundation, the fact
almost begrudgingly. i didn t sense a lot of love in the room or idealization or forgiveness in fact. this was said in the washington post and he ll read it to you. she said her decision to speak before the cameras about her husband represented weiner s best and really only chance at somehow surviving this latest set of revelations. abedin prevented the hastily called press conference from devolving into a media feeding frenzy. it looked painful but how did she help weiner here? this was a hail mary pass, okay? it s 50/50 whether weiner can continue in this race. the new york times, wall street journal, major newspapers all over the east coast are trashing him calling him they are mad. asking for him to get out of the race. they are mad. and right fofully so. she has a when he said this is behind me and he s had a number of untruths as we say in
no amount of denial or outrage will be as persuasive to the public and the president s political foes know it. joining me, senior political editor mark murray. go into detail on what you mean by that. that has to do with the fact that there is now a full-on media feeding frenzy going on. when you are just dealing with the benghazi e-mails, that was one thing. you end up dealing with the irs investigation. now comes this story about the justice department, wanting phone records for a.p. reporters and editors. and it turns into a feeding frenzy. it is very important that we don t have all the facts. my colleague chuck todd just reported that one of the big talking points regarding the benghazi e-mails from the white house, from very senior white house official ben rhodes, the national security adviser ended up saying according to some earlier reporting from last week that he wanted to help address the state department s concerns in drafting these benghazi
an official saying the person was scene on surveillance camera from a lord & taylor department store. what is going on in these meetings tonight? joining me now is clint van zandt. clint, thanks for being who are. good to be with you, al. clint, put yourself inside the office in boston tonight. yeah. where are you and what are you doing and what is the team doing? number one, you take a deep breath and realize that there are 60 agencies involved. some of those in law enforcement may be some type of source for the media. the last thing that investigators want and you and i are part of the media, but the last thing they want is a media feeding frenzy. we only have to think back to