If you post an immunization rate and they are lacking, they will come up. I suspect if you did that for elementary schools, we are going to post the rate of the children immunized here, so what are your comments on that . First, i would like to agree with your last comment about posting rates for schools. We want parents to be informed about vaccines in general and we should also want them to be informed in the environment they are putting their children in. There is no doubt that is going with 40 or 50 of unimmunized children is there a push to do so . We should be letting parents know as much as possible about both because i read the pediatrics article that staff provided. If a pediatrician pushes immunization, she is more likely to convince someone to vaccinate them if she is passive, thats ok, i will sign a no. To what degree are we posting individual clinics or to individual schools . It seems like you should be doing that in santa monica. The rates for School Vaccination are Publ
Capital gain, youre going to end Chuck Grassley up with much higher, generate. And indeed, thats whats happened when president clinton came in. Capital gains went back in and the rates went to 39 . And seems to me that theres a lot more coherence in a bill with a lower rate that treats capital and labor the same. Thank you, senator. Thank you, both, for coming. I want to start with something you both touched on in your opening statement, but to get more specific, and so ill start with with senator packwood, but ill ask senator bradley the similar question. It deals with the robert bob w. Packwood process of president ial reform. Do you think tax reform would have happened if president reagan had not made tax reform a priority in his administration and a follow on and then isnt it going to take at least that much commitment or involvement from president obama with with his own party in congress to get a tax reform bill enacted and then for senator bradley, could you share your thoughts
And then you have a little more wiggle room using either side of that equation to be able to reach your revenue neutrality. Okay, bill. Senator. We, of course, did it revenue neutral. I think the times today probably might require some additional tax. But i believe thats something that the committee has to work out itself. If you really do thorough tax reform, what you find is at least we found that upper income americans will pay a higher percent. For example, we cut the rate from 50 to 28 and yet the top 5 paid a higher percent of the total tax revenue after that reduction than before. Well the u. S. Is one of five Major Economies operating on a worldwide tax system. Meaning it currently taxes the income of its companies wherever that income is earned. Even if its not in our country. Currently companies have profits they earn back to the u. S. But they face a tax of 35 minus foreign tax credits. Those would not pay this additional tax and keep earnings abroad, deferring the additiona
So thank you for your leadership. Hearing is adjourned. Later today the Brookings Institution hears from tony blinken to talk about current priorities and future prospects for u. S. Engagement in central asia. That will be live on cspan starting at 3 30 p. M. Eastern. And Runoff Election scheduled for april 7th in chicagos mayoral race. Rahm emanuel faces his challenger chewy garcia. It is hosted by ttwtv in chicago. Neither won a majority this februarys election. You can see the Candidates Forum starting tonight at 8 00 on cspan. Today is the ted line for an agreement in the Nuclear Talks with iran. A reporter joined us this morning on washington journal to give us an update on the negotiations taking place in swizer land. Thomas erdbrink joins us on the phone. Thanks so much. Thanks for having me. What is the latest on the talks . There has been some reports of a possible extension by hour here. What are you hearing in tehran . Well, of course being in tehran means take im from the s
Or google or you want to hire real talent, you pay them more because you really need that talent, so that you pay them more to offset the employment tax. If youre working the lumberyard in oregon or somewhere, where theres a surplus of labor, the you dont pay them more to offset it, so the irony is that it ends up hitting the lower paid guy and the lower the struggling industry more than it hits the person whos in the consulting or technology industry. So reducing those employment taxes are have many benefits. For example, 24 Million People or 25 Million People working part time now could very well be brought into the workforce. You could find people that werent working to be brought into the workforce, so thats the good news. The question is, what are you going to use to provide the money to do that . And you know, i know the committee has looked at it. Its probably not possible. But who knows . They said tax reform wasnt possible in 86. You could take a dollar gasoline tax or you cou