succession. and by that i mean this is not necessarily the total game against roger stone. this may only be the opening chapter. the second observation that i have is that roger stone famously said i have actually communicated with julian assang and i wondered in this document, because roger then backed off of those statements, i ve wondered if in this document there would be any direct link between assange and stone? i m not seeing one. i ve read it twice, i don t think there s anything in here. it seems like it s all through intermediaries. the third observation is i asked roger stone on cnn on november 3rd do you anticipate being indicted? and in giving me a long-winded explanation, what he said is i m guilty of hyping, punking, posturing, promoting and bluffing. what he was saying is, i m a bs artist and what i was doing is taking information in the public domain and spinning it as if i