wasn t there? thank you much for havin: wasn t there? thank you much for having me wasn t there? thank you much for having me on wasn t there? thank you much for having me on the wasn t there? thank you much for having me on the show. wasn t there? thank you much for having me on the show. i - wasn t there? thank you much for having me on the show. i was - having me on the show. i was strip searched. it was actually three offices who did it. back in 2013, after i had been arrested for offering a legal advice card to a 16 year old who is being stopped and starts. and that was involved being pinned to the floor of her cell and having my hands cuffed, my legs tied together, and my close cut off with scissors. it took me eight years to receive a kind of partial apology from the match. they apologised for some of the language they used after cctv, which they had the whole time, finally emerged showing the officer who ordered my strip searched saying, treat her like a terrorist. in n
courts, but may get more information to power her appeal. and then imagine how many people who he has done business with who are going to pore over these documents and determine hey, this loss that he claimed when he dealt with me wasn t really a loss, and now i have a fraud claim too. so this is a very bad circumstance for donald trump. i m glad you brought this up, because debt is an issue, right. one of the reasons why we care as americans about whether our president has foreign investments that can be leveraged against him, whether there are conflicts of interest. there is a kind of public interest in seeing what candidates and what presidents have in terms of their finances. i think where the republicans will have a point is that originally, democrats said look, this is just about this audit process. we only want to know about this audit process. i don t think anyone ever really believed that. and now they definitely won t believe that, because in the last couple of weeks, it s
outside agitators who come in and their goal is to foment unrest and violence and chaos. we ll see if any of those people duke was trouble. emily compagno from outnumbered is standing by. she has been watching this, as we all have. emily, your thoughts on this acquittal on all charges for kyle rittenhouse? emily: thanks so much, john. part of me wasn t surprised. i want to take the ruse into exactly with the jurors were deliberating. we know there were five counts. only four of which had this self defense privilege. we talk about burden. we talk about the burden to prove worthy burden to overcome. all criminal trials, the burden is on prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime that they are charged with. when you bring in the self defense privilege, and that burden is on the defense to prove that indeed not only did the defendant reasonably believe that he was in fear of great bodily harm or death but it was
there were lights last night all across the hill over there. 20 years ago before 9/11, this city was much more in the dark ages. it was dark, this building wasn t here, that tall building behind me wasn t here. the city has a much more prosperous feel to it. the roads have been built across the country. that is really thanks to the u.s. engagement here, u.s. tax dollars. but, you know, underlying the sort of physical and economic change for the better was of course changes for human rights, improvement, the rights for women, 25% almost to be part of the constitution to be in the government. tho now with the taliban me it is like stepping back in time to the taliban days in the 1990s. they say that it will be different. so far the government isn t any different to the past. so, you know, you see some
case in point, florida paula white. it is beyond phenomenal, from psychiatric care, children in addition, medical care, a chapel, events, schooling, language, love. you know, there s an entire group that provide all of those services for free no less. they are called parents. but i digress. the minister in me wasn t ready