hyde amendment law and henry waxman says to him no, and you heard what he said, congressman weiner, henry waxman, according to bart stupak, said but we want to pay for abortions, we think we should. how can how can you say that doesn t matter? hold on a second, you re asking anthony weiner to comment on megyn overhearing what bart stupak said? wait a minute. why don t we talk about what s in the law. if bart stupak says tomorrow i want to restate the hyde amendment, done. no one is objecting to that. megyn: apparently someone is. incorrect. no, incorrect. megyn: it doesn t matter to you at all that congress that you ve got congressman waxman according to stupak telling him we want to pay for aborings with taxpayer money? it doesn t megyn: and he says we think we should. what s important is not what you re telling me stupak and waxman are talking about. what s important is what you and i are talking about, which is what s in this bill. mig meg it s relevant