as is often the case when she is involved, a lot of people have offered their opinion about what goes on and it is only reasonable given the amount of commentary and that some of it relates to you, that you are given the opportunity to set the record straight on a couple of things. two suggestions that have been made in public are that, firstly, you were asked to delay publication in the uk by a day to give american media a 24 hour head start. what?! is that not true? not true. because that has been published. how do you respond to that when you see it published? the issue? people say, there was a suggestion in a book that was out recently that meghan s team asked you to delay publication in the uk by a day to give american media a 24 hour head start. not that i know of. you havejust told me something. and to what extent did the royal household, which meghan was a part of at the time, try to take control of promotion of the issue? you know, vogue is vogue. nobody told us what to do. we
told me something. and to what extent did the royal household, which meghan was a part of at the time, try to take control of promotion of the issue? you know, vogue is vogue. nobody told us what to do. we have our deadlines, our drop dates, our social media dates, so nobody interfered with us. was the stress of that edition worth it? for me, i am all about representing the zeitgeist and reflecting what is going on in society. and at that moment in time, you know, she was the zeitgeist and we had to report on it. that is very important to me. to reflect the moment. the cover of september s vogue features linda evangelista again. in recent years, linda evangelista has gone from being one of the most photographed women in the world to perhaps one of the least after big complications with cosmetic surgery. why did you put her on the cover? it was sad for me to see my friend, who i love, just disappear from the world because of, you know, all she went through
is impossible to talk about what you have done it vogue without talking about the guest editing that meghan markle did. this occupies only a couple of pages in your booking you describe her as a phenomenal editing partner but as everyone has noticed as is often the case when she is involved, people offer their opinion about what is going on and it is only reasonable given the amount of commentary and that some of it relates to you, that you were given the opportunity to set the record straight. two suggestions made in public that, firstly, you must to delay publication in the uk by a day to give the american media 24 hour head start. is that not true? that has been published. that not true? that has been published- that not true? that has been ublished. ., ., y., , published. how do you respond to that? the published. how do you respond to that? the issue? published. how do you respond to that? the issue? the - to that? the issue? the suggestion to that? the issue? the suggestio
listen. there are allegations that something may have been planted to use against the former president in the january 6th committee hearings, things of that nature. you didn t see anything like that happen? at this point i don t necessarily think that they would go to the extent of trying to plant information, i think they just make stuff up and, you know, come up with whatever they want and that s the way that they will have to proceed in order to actually try to indict the president because they don t have anything. what the fbi is probably doing is planting evidence which is what they did during the russia hoax. we also have a hunch they doctored evidence to get the warrant. for example, do i know that the boxes of material they took from mar-a-lago, that they won t put things in those boxes to entrap him? how do we know that they are going to be honest with us about what s actually in the box as soon as how do we know that was in the box before it left the residence if the
investigations, you know, i think i think i mean, that personally tells me something, but, again, i leave it to your viewers to draw their own conclusiones. alberto gonzales, sir, thank you so much for being with us this morning. you bet. so we did mention evan perez s reporting of concern within the justice department about the information vacuum that has allowed trump and his allies to fill it with this possible outlandish information and there is one example of it, again, with no basis in fact, none, trump has concocted this notion that maybe the fbi planted evidence during its search of mar-a-lago. in a post on true social trump wrote, quote, they wanted to be left alone without any witnesses to see what they were doing, taking or hopefully not planting, that in quotation marks. so this baseless conspiratorial idea was first floated by trump lawyer christina bob but in 24 hours it evolved and it spread in the right wing eco sphere.