would be. she was banned for life in that network would be. she was banned for life in that network and would be. she was banned for life in that network and the that network and the consequences are obvious in so many different ways, if she were reflecting earlier, things, she was a trailblazer because things moved more to her position that away from it and in terms of this, how would you assess it. it and in terms of this, how would you assess it you assess it. you talk to irish women and you assess it. you talk to irish women and i m you assess it. you talk to irish women and i m speaking i you assess it. you talk to irish women and i m speaking to i you assess it. you talk to irish | women and i m speaking to you you assess it. you talk to irish i women and i m speaking to you as you assess it. you talk to irish - women and i m speaking to you as a man, the enormous changes that we haven t gotten exactly to wear those changes are meant to be, she had a major role she spo
but they have no idea how many there are out there that not are either. trump fans just, you know, more conservative. yeah, right. and conservative to me.se i don t see what s changed.ou whenng i was young, a conservative was like, you know, sweater s college of i haven t my life since the eighties, okay? i m not i m not . but you know, it s like if i said the f word when i was young, i was running out of the house because i was about to get paddled. yeah. or was something like this . and you nowadays it s like conservatives are a little hipper. you know, it s you know,tt a little more on the openhe hand . i m sure that ll be the headline from our you know, from the left wing. c i can already see their headlines on this interview. it s like talking kid rock s love story together. like i got embarrassed. oh , i mean, look, i respect i anyone who thinks for himself m even if that person reaches different conclusions from what i don t really back is people who just sign up forhe the pro
you can bet when it get topic of discussion, global trade is going to be numero uno. mark thompson a radio host for sirius. and brett stephens, ist for the new york times. brendon, you can make a case that president trump is playing one country off the other to get a better deal individually? i cannot me se. as you and i about it before, we have to credit the trump administration for taking trade seriously having bad effects on communities. the problem is the main culprit has been china. they produce too much steel. they subsidize their own industries. there s a list of things they have done wrong on trade. we do need to address that. instead of what we re doing, we re fighting a seven-front trade war that doesn t seem to make sense. one, it is hard in any case to do a bunch of bilateral trade
joining me s.e. cupp and van jones. we ll get to syria in a moment but i was watching your guns debate there. fascinating debate between all of you and wanted to ask you s.e. cupp, about this issue of the blind being given gun permits in iowa. are you a fan of that? you know, i m not a fan of arbitrary rules that target certain classes of people, except criminals and all of these laws do nothing but burden law-abiding people who follow laws and don t strengthen gun legislation, they don t prohibit crime and so keeping a blind person from having a gun, prankly, isn t what we need to be worried about or talking about. se i s.e. i love your work and style but somebody with you with your intelligence looks at me down the camera and says blind people having guns is not an issue, i think you ve gone stark raving
intelligence looks at me down the camera and says blind people having guns is not an issue, i think you ve gone stark raving mad. to be frank, gun owners and it s not your fault for not knowing this, most people who talk about gun control don t really know much about it but most have to take safety classes and are incredibly responsible with our firearms and a blind person who might not all the way be completely blind by the way would have to go through the same kind of training and safety courses both on how to shoot his gun, use his gun, keep his gun, protect his gun, secure his gun. they can t see, s.e. you re treating blind people like they are all 100% blind. some may wear glasses, some may be considered legally blind but can see and why shouldn t they have the opportunity to defend themself van jones, am i losing the plot?