former aide in the bush white house, now an msnbc political analyst, and richard painter, former white house ethics lawyer in the bush administration. i want to read some of what ted cruz said as we just played it. he basically said it s certainly possible, and there are a kip couple that could vote that way. but anyone voting on the facts, anyone voting on the law, this is a very easy vote. do you think there is a possible crack here? i certainly think senator lisa murkowski was hinting at her displeasure with the process, and she has been known to break ranks in the looking a collins who is probably going to face a tougher reelection battle than she had was willing in 96 with the clinton impeachment or actually it would have been 98 by then, to not vote with republicans to impeach bill clinton on one of the impeachment charges. so if you re a if you are in a purple state, if you re cory gardner, if you re joni ernst,
oval office meeting, national welcome back, everybody. breaking news on the question of security adviser john bolton, who might need to testify at the defense secretary mark esper, and secretary of state mike impeachment trial. a judge today dismissing a high profile case that could have set a precedent for potential impeachment witnesses. a top aide to john bolton had sued to avoid testifying in the house. the judge dismissing that lawsuit after the house dropped the subpoena. the key here is that bolton had cited that suit as a reason not to testify. that obstacle no longer existing. joining me now is former acting solicitor general neal katyal. neal, good evening to you. thanks for joining us on us. major breaking news with regards to possible testimony from john bolton, as i just talked through a bit. i want to play a bit of what john bolton said about this case last week, and then get you to weigh in. although i have a lot to say on the subject, the prudent course for me is ju
of state mike pompeo, and national security adviser john or make me feel like i m not really there. bolton had a previously undisclosed oval office meeting with trump where they tried but talk to your doctor, failed to convince him to and call 844-234-2424. release that money. today senate democrats arguing the new reporting bolsters their case for witnesses at the creais back at red lobster.ast with new creations to choose from; impeachment trial. as speaker pelosi continues to like rich, butter-poached maine lobster and crispy crab-stuffed shrimp rangoon. withhold the actual impeachment articles and trump is lashing how will you pick just 4 of 10? out, tweeting a series of attacks on speaker pelosi it won t be easy. better hurry in. throughout the weekend, the latest of 48 tweets he sent about her since the house actually impeached him. with me john flannery, neera tanden, a former top aide to president obama and hillary clinton and mark thompson. host of the naked plain podcast. j
this makes the choice even more underlying issue of corruption clear. will the senate hold a clear and it s not clear how successful they would be. trial or enable a cover-up? but for trump s opponents, it is we know john s opinion on this a potential approach that has in that he doesn t think this led to the ousting of heads of they re going to hold a fair states when the odds seem trial. stacked against it. neera, what do you make of it? will we actually see any of short of influencing the impeachment trial itself, it s these four individuals from mark something that could have esper to mulvaney to bolton broader political impact on the testify? and who do you think is the best 2020 election in november. to tell this story? next, one more thing special to i mean, i think what s the beat. the beating? stunning about the new york go to hilton instead of a travel site and you ll experience times story is that reporters are able to get the facts and a whole new range of emotions like
and now for their service to the community, that was for you, john. we present limu emu & doug lots of new information here. how can this information be with this key to the city. possibly used without new [ applause ] witnesses? i think the thing that s wrong here is the entire discussion, that after you it s an honor to tell you that liberty mutual customizes your car insurance impeach someone in articles that you re restricted in any way to so you only pay for what you need. and now we need to get back to work. the evidence that you used to get the articles. [ applause and band playing ] of course you can supplement proof at a real trial in a fair only pay for what you need. tribunal with new evidence which liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. relates to the charges at hand. so in other words, the information from the center for public integrity and what the the good news? our comfort lasts all day. the bad news? so does his energy. new york times published, all of that sho