this day in and day out. your thoughts about today s as garrett put it, the climax. garrett is exactly right. this was a moment built to take advantage of susan collins. ostensible indecision. very strategic about who was standing behind her. about having her go out and give this speech. they knew everybody would be paying attention to it because she was this person who hadn t made up their mind. all very strategically done. by whom? the white house isn t strategic. but mitch mcconnell is strategic and it wouldn t surprise me if maybe we re overreadings this but it s a fairly safe adjustmention. the vote itself is remarkable. this will be the closest since the mid-19th century. this is not the way supreme court justices were normally confirmed up until about, what, 15 years ago. normally it was generally pretty bipartisan. but since that has happened, collins and senator lindsey graham are the only ones that have consistently voted in
message me if total buzz kill. guys, education. we want to know where got the degree. ditch the pick up lines and tell us what sports you play and post pictures that make you natural or to quote your piece, not like a can see say this on cnn? a bad as. what do you see as the biggest mistake both sexes can make? i think some of the mistakes that people make is kind of being too shallow. first of all, if you are given three people who you could connect with, you don t focus on them having that. if there 100, loafers when you wanted converse might be something. what? i don t know. people have different inclinations. if you know there 50 more people waiting for you, it s easy to swipe no. if the photo choice that you use
they are not consistent with anything, anything, gdp, ism survey. how do you make sense of this? i ll tell you how i make sense of it, next month, we ll get the bench mark revision and they ll be all revised up. jared bernstein, former chief economist for vice president joe biden, former msnbc contributor and fellow at the policy and priorities. do you agree with mark zandi? to a point. the underlying trend before this report was 200,000 jobs a month. as you mention, 74,000 for december is way below trend. and there s a lot of noise in the monthly data, and it wouldn t surprise me if, again, the numbers get revised up. however, i wouldn t go as far as my good friend mark in terms of throwing the number out, because, a, it s not entirely inconsistent with an economic recovery that s thrown a lot of head banks, if i can use a basketball term, at the job