and 30 hours is a lot of time to spend with prosecutors. just to be clear about what you said, and just then, john, sources telling cnn that mcgahn didn t provide any incriminating evidence to the special counsel. again, that s according to the washington post. it s only this past weekend that mcgahn s attorneys told the president s attorneys that he doesn t think he implicated the president. but isn t it a major failure on the part of the president s attorneys that they weren t fully debriefed about the extent of these interviewed? well, it s kind of typical of the trump white house operation, where they seem to botch and mess up everything. normally that would have been the case. they would have said, what do you have to say, before he went over and heard his story, and then they would have debriefed him when he came back. that didn t happen. up, we said since this has been going since he took office,
investigation and to win in the court of public opinion which is very much part of a larger strategy here and then by talking about these other official official officials. hillary clinton is back on the main stage, she s going to headline three fund raiser ins san francisco, chicago, and new york city. it s interesting she s focusing on fund-raisers, focusing on democrats in cities not in these rural areas where she needed to win and didn t is is that the right calculation? miscalculation? is what democrats need right now? i think it looks like she is trying to do this in a measured way that s helpful and not
firing. he was there shoaleder to shoulder he doesn t know what mueller knows. it seems implausible to me that he doesn t provide factual material that s illuminating about the president s state of mind. so i think raeurlts little bit over confident to be saying that at this point. but the real question is why would trump s lawyers not debrief mcgahn? the white house counsel has given 30 hours of interviews. much of which the trump legal team is in the dark with. it s like a book on tape, isn t it? that s a lot of testimony. the white house got nothing out of this in return for letting all of these people submit to interviews. you would have thought that they would have at least negotiated, been able to debrief everyone.
didn t see that on the website. he s been acting more and more like his dad. come on, guys! jump in! the water s fine! tom pritchard. how we doin ? hi, there. tom pritchard. can we get a round of jalapeño poppers for me and the boys, please? i ve been saving a lot of money with progressive lately, so. progressive can t protect you from becoming your parents. but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us.
he implicated the president in any league wrongdoing. how significant of a development is that? he left the question open, he was clear mcgahn didn t feel he personally witnessed criminal conduct and he would have resigned if he had. they say they don t know what other people might have told. i think there s a larger message that came in the prior story and that was mcgahn was most separated because he was concerned trump might be throwing him under the bus, it might be a john dean situation where the white house could be sell serves jail time and that means don mcgahn who is an experienced attorney through atmospherics or because he believe there is might be something specific believe there is is liability so he is taking steps to protect himself against that. ahead, security clearance