love, inside the michael jackson case, diane dimond, and attorney riva martin. i m glad to see both of you here today. i m curious about the headline and the ruling ever since i saw it. let me begin with you, diane. you broke the news of an inappropriate relationship between michael jackson and a young boy in 1993. i wonder, based on then to now, so many years have passed. what was your reaction to friday s ruling reviving the ability to bring this to court? well, you know, i wasn t surprised. many states have gone into their statute of limitations. i know the two men s attorney. i think it comes down to this if the catholic church is
saying he was not a victim of molestation or anything inappropriate. gim given he is a plaintiff with this, were you splized he was there with a different story? you know, let s go back to 1993 when he was a little boy and i kept hearing his name come up over and over. maybe eventualens wasn t started then. i write about many of the employees at mjj productions who told me, we were lavishing gifts on them. and their mothers. anything they wanted. this is the crux of their claim. people in the entity aided and abetted michael jackson in the abuse of them.