diaz-balart. we begin with a decision from the u.s. supreme court that will have huge implications for colleges and universities and society in general. last hour the justices said schools cannot use race as a consideration when it comes to admitting students. ruling that affirmative action programs both at harvard and the university of north carolina are unconstitutional. it is also a decision that could have implications far beyond education. with us now to take a closer look at this, we have nbc news correspondent julia ainsley, who is outside the supreme court, we have reverend al sharpton there in the center of the screen, president of the national action network and host of politics nation on msnbc, as well as maya riley, president of the leadership conference on civil and human rights. welcome to you all on this extraordinary news day. julia, what more did the justices have to say in their decision? reporter: well, in short, they have ended affirmative action as we
testify in georgia tomorrow. also tonight, vote remembers going to the polls in two states with liz cheney s political career on the line in wyoming and lisa murkowski facing a challenge for her senate seat in alaska and get this, sarah palin is trying to become relevant again. get that skit ready, snl. i m tiffany cross in for joy reid. we begin with a familiar place, maybe even a happy place, because donald trump is once again at the center of controversy. this time over classified top secret documents that led to the mar-a-lago raid. now the judge who approved a search warrant will hear arguments thursday over whether to unseal the search warrant affidavit. the doj has asked a judge to keep it sealed while trump wants it released. meanwhile, republicans and pro-jump extremists continue to slam the fbi and justice department over their search and now there s another talking point floating in the ether saying what trump actually did it was no big deal. i think mar-a-lago
A. B. Stoddard, and social injure lawyers maya riley, and founder of whats been called the davos of femme niism, the one and only tina brown, all these ladies will be here and why they believe the future is female. We have to begin this morning with House Democrats demanding information from the white house and the attorney general, but heres the thing. It doesnt mean theyre going to get it. Chairman jerry nadler says attorney general bill barr has until today to hand over bob muellers unredacted report or face a subpoena. Theres no indication. Meanwhile, the chairman of the House Oversight committee, Elijah Cummings says the administration has refused to handle over a single piece of paper or provide a sing the witness as part of their the investigation. But up chairman cummings says he aint giving up. Later today his committee will issue a subpoena to depose a man by the name the carl klein. Carl klein was in charge when dozens of white house officials were allegedly granted highleve
Activist and 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. framed his own speech as "malinformation" during a hearing on the government's role in helping Big Tech censor content online.
in 2003. she looked into the future 25 years and envisioning a society where this would not need to be in existence any longer and here we are five years earlier from that point and look what has happened. so my question to you now, maya, what should we take away from this decision? how is this going to have a domino effect, not only for colleges and universities, but let s think about how other schools, k through 12 systems, will try to become race neutral in feeding these schools that will now try to endeavor to find race neutral admissions processes? well, first, let s just say that once again this particular supreme court has ignored decades of precedent in its ruling today, including the fact that that statement about 25 years, which came from sandra day o connor, who had affirmed affirmative action, writing the majority opinion on the university of michigan case was making very clear that that was