in lower right rib cage. what we learned here among other things is that every single person kyle rittenhouse shot or shot at on august 25th in kenosha had a lengthy and violent criminal record. that seems relevant. but the jury doesn t know it. thanks to unethical behavior by the prosecution, he never had to testify in court and yetav apparently, freeland told prosecutors he wanted immunity before he would agree to appear on the stand. the assistant district attorney in the case thomas binger refused to provide that that means the state knew all along exactly who maurice freeland was. but they withheld that information from kyle rittenhouse s lawyers. as a result of that kyle rittenhouse was deprived of his constitutional right under the confrontation clause to challenge the accuser in open court. that s not supposed to happen. it can t happen. and that s not the only relevant evidence that was withheld from kyle rittenhouse s lawyers during this trial. we re about to show you some dr
authorities that freeland threw her to the ground and kicked her in lower right rib cage. what we learned here among other things is that every single person kyle rittenhouse shot or shot at on august 25th in kenosha had a lengthy and violent criminal record. that seems relevant. but the jury doesn t know it. thanks to unethical behavior by the prosecution he never had to testify in court and yet apparently freeland told prosecutors he wanted immunity before he would agree to appear on the stand. of the assistant district attorney in the case thomas binger refused to provide that that means the state knew all along exactly who maurice freeland was. but they withheld that information from kyle rittenhouse s lawyers. as a result of that kyle rittenhouse was deprived of his constitutional right under the confrontation clause to challenge the accuser in open court. that s not supposed to happen. it can t happen. and that s not the only relevant evidence that was withheld from kyle rittenho
face and knocking him down. rittenhouse responds by firing his rifle twice and both times he missed. tonight, the jury is considerini whether rittenhouse acted recklessly when he fired those two shots and, yet, and here set the point, the jury has no idea as it deliberates who this man is. the prosecution never identified him. prosecutors claimed they didn t know his identity and they had no way to find it out. so that means that rittenhouse s defense attorneys never got to cross-examine this man orns introduce any evidence about his behavior that night. that s not a small thing. according to the daily mail, new reporting today that man s name is maurice freeland. freeland has admitted that he attacked rittenhouse moments before another man, a domestic abuser called anthony huber started bashing rittenhouse in the head with a skateboard. who is maurice freeland? according to the daily mail is he a criminal. disorderly conduct and damage to property. in one case, a woman reporte