To that. I think thats the main issues we have before us is we dont have an expert here to address that point, so im wondering what the options are to get some answers to that question. Supervisor campos. Yeah, and i appreciate the nature of the discussion. I guess for me, the analysis is a little different in the sense that i can see why if there are limitations on how retirements work, that maybe that exception could make sense here, but i think that instead of including the exception and then finding out whether or not the limitations exist, i think its better to do it the other way around. I think its better to know what those limitations are because if those limitations are not what we think they are and you lose it in there, then youre creating a loophole that could be ex mroited. We need a vote. Supervisor cohen. Aye. Supervisor farrell. Aye. Supervisor kim. No. Supervise mar. No. Tang. Aye. Supervisor wiener. Aye. Supervisor yee. Aye. Supervisor avalos. No. Supervisor breed. Ay
And so forth, if i find out the limitations are harder than i had thought, i would i would like in the future and take that thing out of there, but for today, i will support the amendment. Speaker supervisor kim. Actually to address the supervise yees question, it would be great to find some type of resource to address retirement account issue, but im not sure who can provide us that answer so we can have some finals in the terms of including or not including this in the hardship. Im open to the retirement account issue excludeing that from the assets, but non liquid properties is not considered. If you own expensive artwork or 203,050,000, that should be considered as part of what you own, and that is exactly what personal property includes. I gets it sounds unreasonable to go to clothing and hopefully the board can work on non liquid property, but this includes high valued property like painting and jewelry. As far as the retirement issue, im open on this issue. I want to understand
Passed with. Our board has landlord and tenant they refused to stream line until they see the outcomes, but i believe well move into the area of having uniformed hardship criteria and the criteria will be different for ten ands and landlords. Well always look at the landlords picture. We embraced the amendment that passed because we would look at Bank Accounts and medical bills and assets and the look at the whole picture. We would look at landlords and tenants. Youre going to have competing equities and youre going to have small landlords who have one asset and youre going to have tenants who are being displaced. Its the war of the equities and the landlord will always come before us with a significant asset. Thank you very much. Any further discussions . Colleagues on supervisor wieners amendment, why dont we take a role call vote. Supervisor cohen. Aye. Supervisor farrell. Aye. Supervisor kim. No. Supervisor mar. No. Supervisor tang. Aye. Supervisor wiener. Aye. Supervisor yee. No.
Steve this is a fox news alert. The clock is ticking as millions of people are told to pack up and head to Higher Ground as Hurricane Florence heads for the carolinas. Ainsley look at that ariel footagaerialfootage. Its a monster as its surging. All of this water surge expected to slam the east coast and President Trump sounding off on the potential catastrophic damage to come. They havent seen anything like whats coming at us in 25, 30 years, maybe ever. Its tremendously big. We have live Team Coverage. Todd piro. We begin with our own Griff Jenkins in Atlantic Beach, North Carolina where people are facing a guam threat this morning, good morning, griff. Thats right. We have all the components for a catastrophic, lifethreatening weather event that could last for days. Let me show you why. Hurricane winds 140 Miles Per Hour or thereabouts expected to come across here and certainly the outer northern bands. You can hear rumbling behind me, i think. Thats not quite the storm yet. You wil
The president say this is the one witness who he worries about the most. Yesterday tim morrison said people refer to it as the dpornd problem another first there was a bit of a smirk before he went there, so well show you all of that. Meanwhile former special envoy kurt volker on tuesday made important changes to his original testimony. Volker now says the demand to investigate the bidens was, quote, inappropriate, and former President Joe Biden did nothing wrong. He said a lot of the blame lies with Gordon Sondland and Rudy Giuliani. The gordon problem . The gordon problem. Three other officials testified yesterday the decision to investigate biden was inappropriate. Wi we begin our coverage with Suzanne Malveaux live on capitol hill. Another big day, suzanne. Good morning, alisyn. I asked about the gordon problem, the fact that he went to various diplomats, doing the various bidding, asking for things they felt they could not deliver. The source saying its unclear whose problem it is