working did not turn a local workplace into an unlawful one. that is a matter ofjudgment, isn t it? important to remember that the rules and restrictions that everybody else in this country at the time, and ultimately, it comes down to a common sense decision about whether thatis common sense decision about whether that is a good judgment on behalf of the prime minister charged with keeping everyone safe or not. it’s a keeping everyone safe or not. it s a really good keeping everyone safe or not. it s a really good point. keeping everyone safe or not. it s a really good point, one keeping everyone safe or not. it s a really good point, one of keeping everyone safe or not. ut s . really good point, one of the questions mps will be weighing up, is there any evidence there was intent from the prime minister to mislead. if you accept that argument that there was interpretation involved in that, it may be harder for mps to say definitively, yes, we think he knew and did not tell p
recklessness, they have given him the chance to respond and they will take advice from sir ernest ryder. they are meeting privately before borisjohnson comes in to make them at give evidence, they will meet after and they will consider the report before they send it to parliament. is a balance of probabilities or is it beyond reasonable doubt? this is a matterfor them, because this is not a court and it cannot be challenged in court because a parliamentary privilege. exactly what standard of proof they are going to go for it remains to be seen. they will set out the evidence and leave mps to decide whether mps are satisfied that this is contempt of parliament by misleading the house. just to pick up the example with nick, which was part of borisjohnson s bundle of evidence, for example, if he says it s a matter ofjudgment, whether allowing some drinks at your desk is a party or not. how in terms of parliamentary and legal procedure do you decide that? what the committee has published t
what happened but also to start to address what i ve been describing today around the crisis at manston on what she s doing about that. that is really where her attention should be focused today. but is really where her attention should be focused today. be focused today. but given those issues and dealing be focused today. but given those issues and dealing with be focused today. but given those issues and dealing with those - be focused today. but given those i issues and dealing with those issues issues and dealing with those issues is a matter ofjudgment, when you read the letter and it finishes with an apology saying she accepted responsibility, do you think that is the end of the matter? i responsibility, do you think that is the end of the matter? responsibility, do you think that is the end of the matter? i don t think it will be in the end of the matter? i don t think it will be in parliament the end of the matter? i don t think it will be in parliament today. - the
comprehensive view of his views rather comprehensive view of his views rather than the selective view that was given rather than the selective view that was given at lunchtime? | rather than the selective view that was given at lunchtime? rather than the selective view that was given at lunchtime? i have read professor reicher s was given at lunchtime? i have read professor reicher s thread - was given at lunchtime? i have read professor reicher s thread on i professor reicher s thread on twitter today, professor reicher s thread on twittertoday, i professor reicher s thread on twitter today, i think it s a very, i think it s a balanced thread because it goes through the arguments, thatjustify the arguments, that justify the application arguments, thatjustify the application of a vaccine certification scheme and the circumstances in which it would work, where there are high levels of trust on the guidance in place and he highlights the issues that could potentially lead to vaccine
conclusions that it has come to. of course. i conclusions that it has come to. of course. . . conclusions that it has come to. of course. ., ., ., ., course. i am grateful for him to rive course. i am grateful for him to give away- course. i am grateful for him to give away- he course. i am grateful for him to give away. he is course. i am grateful for him to give away. he is right course. i am grateful for him to give away. he is right to - course. i am grateful for him to give away. he is right to say i course. i am grateful for him to j give away. he is right to say it s course. i am grateful for him to l give away. he is right to say it s a matter give away. he is right to say it s a matter of give away. he is right to say it s a matter ofjudgment. in two hours parliament will be asked to vote on whether parliament will be asked to vote on whether or parliament will be asked to vote on whether or not we approve this scheme whether or not we approve this scheme. in the