Conditioners from the alliance and the second is policy 4. 2 that treats all open space requiring the same sort of management as the program. I think so that it may not be intended to be that way but the wortd saying says in this case this should be given to the governmental entity is controls the managed of those areas this sounds like it will be a tack over. The nature Areas Program is a program that plans are cutting down several trees and youre going pesticides those could impact the cities open space and from the citywide point of view and recreation. The trees provide important eco system they slow the water run off and fight pollution and absorb sound and provides habitat for species the birds and animals. The birds dont care whether or not the trees are native or nonnative. They dont allow for ancestor and pets to go off trails to pick a flower it is especially the ones that are left we think with the recreational element is too important and effects two many people to be pushe
Were asked to come up with a selling price and having no insight into what the market was going to look like in 6 or 9 months it was very much the owners to make their best estimate and based on the comparable unit like 4 well, its not there yet but will end up with more storage so the price is as fair as it can be considering we had no insight into the market. The owners would be 03 renter or 2 rerntsz i guess. Its 3 renter and 3 owners. The owners would then share the rents of the represents i assume. Thats actually not true each owner of the unit is entitled to their own they separately own the units okay. Its not they collectively own the 3 rental units. Right technically were all owners of the building in the tic format, however, the tic states our units belong to us. Commissioners, if i might interrupt i want to remind the commission the cost is not under our. View youre only considering whether the subdivision itself is the issue this is more any edition so thank you for your in