around the government s plans to send some asylum seekers to rwanda, which you remember faced a send some asylum seekers to rwanda, which you rememberfaced a number of legal challenges as soon as they were introduced more than a year and a half ago. the government is expected to introduce a bill that ministers say it will aim to block the legal challenges. there is debate within the conservative party about how far that bill should go, what that bill should include. the first thing is, suella braverman saying, it must come in her view, to supply the european convention on human rights. the second thing, suella braverman was sacked by rishi sunak as home secretary and since then she has really been seen as a potential flag then she has really been seen as a potentialflag bearer then she has really been seen as a potential flag bearer for the then she has really been seen as a potentialflag bearerfor the right potential flag bearer for the right of potentialflag bearerfor the r
appointed to. certainly, of course, now as soon as the affair we have seen reports of began, i think certainly she should then have stepped down perhaps quietly from that position because clearly what she was compromised in her relationship with matt hancock as someone giving advice to the health department about how it should be run. ., , department about how it should be run, ., , ., department about how it should be run. . , ., , ., department about how it should be run. . , ., ,., , run. that is what should happen, but it often doesn t run. that is what should happen, but it often doesn t happen. run. that is what should happen, but it often doesn t happen. we ll - run. that is what should happen, but it often doesn t happen. we ll matt l it often doesn t happen. we ll matt hancock survive? it often doesn t happen. we ll matt hancock survive? i it often doesn t happen. we ll matt hancock survive? i think it often doesn t happen. we ll matt hancock survive? i think you - h
because of this. i also think it matters from just the public view and confidence in the government. we have had a number of government ministers now in various different scenarios facing ethical questions and all of them are individually defensible, but none of them seem to resign. that is a bible passage for the conservative party to stand out of the country. of the conservative party can show that ministers take responsibility for their actions and sometimes resign, that undermines public confidence in the integrity of the government. trier? public confidence in the integrity of the government. very quickly, what has done of the government. very quickly, what has done the of the government. very quickly, what has done the most - of the government. very quickly, | what has done the most damage, of the government. very quickly, - what has done the most damage, matt hancock? hypocrisy, orthe handling by borisjohnson of the matter? in a by boris johnson of the matter? in a few da s
the country who had to socially distance at funerals, were unable to hug their loved ones. we only had five people at my dad s funeral and matt hancock is having a jolly with his lady, who. taxpayers paying her her wages as well. it is really. it adds insult to incredible injury. questions are still being asked about whether mr hancock could have broken the ministerial code of conduct and about the appointment of gina coladangelo to a role on the board of the department of health. downing street sources reiterated today that the prime minister considers the matter closed. matt has apologised. he has clearly said that he made a mistake. he regrets that and the prime minister has accepted that, considers the matter closed. very clearly, there is still a huge task for the country and matt as health secretary and all of us in cabinet, we need to get on with that job. questions continue this weekend about whether these revelations make it possible to matt hancock to do so. helen catt, bbc n