WHEELING A woman filed a class-action lawsuit against Matrix Warranty Solutions alleging that they violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Matrix Financial Services, Sing for Service, Hard Tack and John Doe Defendants 1 through 5 were also named as defendants in the suit.
Diana Mey claims her three phone numbers are all on the Do Not Call Registry, but despite that, the defendants directly or through one or more intermediaries, initiated pre-recorded telephone calls to her to induce sales of Matrix s extended warranty services, according to a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia.
Mey claims she received several calls from the defendants regarding extended warranties. She claims she never consented to be called by or on behalf of the defendants and she did not have a prior business relationship with the defendants.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
The South Carolina Court of Appeals rejected the replacement mortgage doctrine on Nov. 25, 2020 and held a home equity line of credit had priority over a subsequent mortgage that secured refinancing of a mortgage prior in time and senior to the HELOC. In
ArrowPointe Federal Credit Union v. Bailey, linked here, the Court of Appeals relied on South Carolina’s statutory race-notice framework to find the home equity line creditor had priority because it recorded its lien before the second mortgage was made and recorded. Appellant filed a motion to reconsider on Dec. 9, 2020, and no action had been taken as of Dec. 30, 2020.