the difference is what we call, not to get fancy, is it a material misrepresentation. again, you have to establish that you knowingly and willingly misrepresented. that s what would trigger a federal offense of lying to the fbi. i m with you. i m just saying if they told the cops when they say if they told the fbi when they say they told the fbi then i don t know how the fbi could be upset about this. but we ll see. joey jackson, i appreciate you, you are a better mind. not better than yours. thanks. that s the first thing you ve ever said that s false on this show. what s going on in idaho, there s a feud between the state s two top leaders. its governor goes out of state for a short trip, the lieutenant governor swoops in, takes power, and takes action. now, it s a very interesting question, did she have the right to do it? maybe. but did she do something that
day. you don t forget your birthday. you certainly would not forget the day, the last day that your son left and did not return. so to the extent that he did that, that is they provided authorities with misinformation or inaccurate information, it really begs the question as to whether or not it was an authentic mistake or whether it was a material misrepresentation in my view. what we do as lawyers is we look at the state of mind. we look at comportment, we look at demeanor, right? that doesn t tell it all, but we look at what the natural state of events should be, and the natural state of events is that you remember something that s significant to you. there s nothing more significant than when our loved one has gone and has not returned. and so i m very suspicious with respect to that misinformation. the laundrie family attorney says the nature reserve is the only place the laundries believe brian could be. how can they say that with any confidence? i don t know that you can say
for presidency this weekend. her assets range between 4 million and 11 million dollars. well below the hefty tax she proposes on the super wealthy with assets of over $50 million. sandra: thank you. bill: let s bring in the a-team now. a good one. brad blakeman former deputy assistant to george w. bush. marie harf, former state department spokeswoman and co-host of benson and harf and matthew continetti editor in chief of the washington free beacon. warren, 1986, in her own handwriting. what do you think? my lawyer hat. a bar registration requires you, if any, to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. it appears this is in her own hand. she claimed on the registration form to the bar to be something that she wasn t. i believe it s a material misrepresentation.
secrecy is dangerous to power, it enhances power and to permit the abuse of power which is why i have been condemning this fisa court since it was created. look how long and hard journalists and politicians have had to work just to see that pfizer warrant application. but can i ask the question, someone is lying about where they began talking about this dossier and shopping it around, and, they are making effort to make it seem like earlier rather than later now that they ve been caught in this life. if a court is the recipient of a lie, if a lawyer or person affiliated with the court could be an fbi agent, that makes a material misrepresentation of the court. that person s career is in jeopardy. and because of that lie i m
the real investigation. we all did. so how would the allegation be corroborated in that setting when you re only setting it up for a he shade/she said. it was set up to be unsatisfying. that s why brett kavanaugh took the unprecedented step of going on fox and painting a perfect picture of himself before a friendly face. and by doing so, he painted himself into a corner that he has spent every moment since then trying to get out of. the proof? many who have known him and may have thought he was a fine choice for the supreme court heard him say things in that interview and then under oath that bothered them because they know differently. now, in a court of law, would he be found guilty of perjury? a 1001 violation for lying to a federal officer. the senators count as that. i don t know. is it a material misrepresentation of fact? what about if it were a big race, an election? look at the president. look at the standard. look at the disaffection. lying is taken as forgiven.