under scores, erin, unprecedented nature of this process leading to the likelihood this will be declassified as soon as tomorrow, erin. thank you, very much, manu. outfront andrew carson sits on the intelligence committee which is where the nunes and schiff memos which is democrat sort of rebuttal memo at this point we won t see comes from. thank you very much congressman i appreciate your time. so your committee produced both of these memos. have you seen the changed version of the nunes memo at this point? i ve not seen the changed version. i ve only seen both the republican and democrat memos that were approved by the committee. but i m deeply concerned, erin. so in terms of these material changes, you heard manu senior democrat official saying five material changes. congressman nunes office the chairman they responded last night saying oh, it was gra
severe fisa abuses against members of his campaign and then his incoming cabinet. sources are telling us the memo will, in fact, be released tomorrow. as can you imagine, after a year of lies and painting of false narrative, democrats in the media they are now hyper vent laying and breathlessly doing everything they can possibly do to discredit and stop the memo from being released. what are they so afraid of? let s start with the msnbc conspiracy host in training, congressman adam schiff? he went running to all his liberal allies in the media like paul revere claiming that the memo sent to the white house had been, quote: secretly altered and, quote, material changes were made. now, in schiff s twisted mind, this means that the memo wouldn t be able to be released to the public because house rules were violated. and the media goes into full hyper ventilation mode and they were ecstatic and they were all wrong. we will explain that in just a second. first, just take a look at what s ha
we have paul ryan and right there just defending the release of this memo. lee zelden was on a moment ago defending the release of this memo. he said an interesting thing. when the memo comes out leadership, senior leadership at the fbi and doj will obviously need to change. well, katy i think lee zelden told you what he was not supposed to say out loud. paul ryan and other republicans made a case releasing the memo is not about the mueller investigation. in their words this is about the fisa reform. that could not be any further from the truth. when zelden talks about changes at the top of the department of justice there s one name associated with this memo that s rod rosenstein. rod rosenstein in addition to being the deputy attorney general is important in this context because he s the one that controls the mueller investigation. bob mueller and his team of investigators go to rod rosenstein every time they have
it relates to the schiff memo. it s important to have a conversation with the democrats, with congressman schiff with regards to whether or not he wants to release the entire memo as is because there are a few components of it that do get into specifics on sources and methods where he can essentially say the same exact thing. he can make the same exact point he s making without a few points that actually do reveal sources and methods. that s conversation that needs be had with congressman schiff. i m all for giving the american public more information not less and that applies to relevant source material in the documents. any undersource material where you can provide that information to the american public if there s any redactions needed that s fine. if there s a document that can t be released that s okay. i understand. but i don t believe we can t provide any of that relevant source material. you say there needs be changes in leadership at the
republicans took up a vote to put their memo out and not put the democratic memo out jim hines asked the chairman is this memo you re putting out the same one that s been circulated the house. the answer is yeah. that didn t turn out to be true. in fact hines pressed him a couple of times but got the same answer. the memo had been altered. we learn later that evening and confront the majority on it. now they had claimed that their changes were clerical. that s not truetter. in fact, yesterday the intelligence committee spokesman said that the fbi was guilty of omissions in court proceedings. one of the changes that the majority made, i can t go into details about it, is to remove the word significant from material changes. they no longer apparently believe any omissions were