the capitol. he was on the fbi most wanted list. now he s not. attorney general refused to answer the question. no one has answered the question. again, this is not a conspiracy theory. it s a lumt mat question. why won t they answer it? and what s the answer? so tucker carlson, meet the 1/6 committee. they have answered the question. it is a conspiracy theory, not grounded in truth. and the january 6th committee debunked it. in a few sentence in a short statement yesterday with this statement, quote, the select committee say wear of unsupported claims that ray epps was an fbi informant based on the fact that he was on the fbi wanted list and then was removed from that list without being charged. the select committee has interviewed mr. epps, mr. epps informs us that they was not employed by, working with, or acting at the direction of any law enforcement agency on january 5th, january 6th, or at any other time, and that he has never been an informant for the
in a position or next year not using oil or gas, not engaged in fossil fuels. we stop subsidizing them and make a significant change and just makes the argument to move to wind and solar but the idea that we re going to end and somehow it does on the surface going to cop to deal with renewable energy. why are you making it look harder for us. it is a legtd mat question. i think that if anybody thinks about it no one thought that tomorrow for example, it is going to take us between now and 2030 to have half the vehicles in america electric so the idea not needing gasoline for automobiles is not realistic but by 2050 zero emissions.
spicer said that s up in the air. it s got to be reviewed. reporter: but he insisted that the president is standing by his son-in-law jared kushner amid questions about the white house adviser s dealings with the russians. absolutely. reporter: you no the epa administrator scott pruitt insisted that the white house is still open to some sort of new paris climate deal but leaders from around the world maintain that s simply not going to happen, wolf. getting back to thult mat question of whether the president believes in climate change, people in the white house today are sounding less like spokespeople and more likes hoax people. wolf. jim acosta reporting from the white house. let s get more from congressman jeffries from new york is joining us, a member of the judiciary committee. congressman, thanks for joining us. thanks for being here, wolf. i want to get your thoughts on the president s climate decision in a few moments but first let me get your reaction to news tha
general and another official who is deceased. wiretap bomb shoal came out today. it was not a bomb shell. i saw the wiretap. it is absolutely not a bomb shell. you are a man who follows the facts and you have come to a logical conclusion. this may be completely nothing there but it is a bit curious is it not that the justice department brushed aside any concerns that any one at justice department was directing the operation and then had to withdraw the account. what issa wants to know is who directed that the account be withdrawn and who originally drew up and wrote up the faulty false, maybe fraudulent letter. did someone direct the justice department to change the story and if so why? i think that is a la get mat question. weren t you working on wednesday, lara when darrell issa said for the record not only is there no evidence that eric holder or the president of the united states knew anything
general and another official who is deceased. wiretap bomb shoal came out today. it was not a bomb shell. i saw the wiretap. it is absolutely not a bomb shell. you are a man who follows the facts and you have come to a logical conclusion. this may be completely nothing there but it is a bit curious is it not that the justice department brushed aside any concerns that any one at justice department was directing the operation and then had to withdraw the account. what issa wants to know is who directed that the account be withdrawn and who originally drew up and wrote up the faulty false, maybe fraudulent letter. did someone direct the justice department to change the story and if so why? i think that is a la get mat question. weren t you working on wednesday, lara when darrell issa said for the record not only is there no evidence that eric holder or the president of the united states knew anything