case is about. laura: well a blatantly false a blatantly false statement. here s the onl y thingin ifn lawyers need to know about this case.ft if after the twenterytion twenty election, donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics,indict alvin would not have indicted him.ed or let s say if after 2020, trump had gradually evolved ind his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes in that case,ve ind alvin bragg would not haveic indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was bookedngerprin and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. wrong he has the wrongs political views. now to the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today. donaldding trump represents an existential threat, a threat to the regim thee that s run our country into the ground fort decades, a threat to the credibilit tibility y the mediae calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all,um another trump term is a threata
with unpaid parking tickets. here guess that s weissman s conclusion here.ly. w said ishat he gambled garbaged garbage. listen, i have personale. experience with him, i ha hatei ha, and i to dignify any comment htee maks with the response. he s the single most ethicallysn bankrupt prosecutor i have ever dealt with in my life. and what he said was just meaningless. but he s been after donaldingles trump for years and yearss.n af trying concoct a theory, as he did with other defendants in the past. he and noroct a m eisen have mat a career to figure out a waye te to get donald trump. it and as i say, it harkens jy back to jerry nadler, who made the most irascible possible a pb comment of a public officialli i ve ever heard when he said we can t trust the electors, we ge can t trust the voters to get lof donald trump. that s what this is about.av it s all i have to get your response to the renowned legal mind at cnn. dana bash. we have to potentiallye differentiate between the le