analyst, julia cayenne. good evening. sarah, bad news for the doj tonight. the judge, rejecting their request to continue the premiere lobe into classified documents while the review plays out. what more do you know? that s right. the judge, basically, set, one, i won t take the government on face value that these documents are classified. she wants a special master to review them. to, she says, she doesn t think it will cause irreparable harm for the justice department to press pause on their ability to review these documents. she said, you can still go forward with parts of their investigation. if you want to talk to witnesses about how these documents were moved, or storage, you can do that. when it comes to reviewing the documents, forensic may be presenting them before a grand jury, which is a helpful thing to do when you re in the middle of a criminal investigation. you can t do anything like that. she does say, they can brief congress, so, we are waiting to see if th
i think that they are presenting. we have some hints of what they re going with, and with the classified information, we can remind people, trump was giving multiple opportunities to fix the problems. just giving him the benefit of the doubt, oh, he made a mistake. they re costly saying, you can fix this, and he clearly didn t want to, and wanted to hold on to them. they have a sense of it, we have some hints of what they re going after, and including the obstruction of justice. it sounds like some people lied to the fbi about whether they were aware there was classified information, that those people may include lawyers, if not trump himself. so, it is a strong case. it is the surprise to this, and we have this notion, and lawyering with the political questioning. they defer to other branches, and their expertise. the executive branch, an expert in national security, defines the expertise within the
analyst, julia cayenne. good evening. sarah, bad news for the doj tonight. the judge, rejecting their request to continue the premiere lobe into classified documents while the review plays out. what more do you know? that s right. the judge, basically, set, one, i won t take the government on face value that these documents are classified. she wants a special master to review them. to, she says, she doesn t think it will cause irreparable harm for the justice department to press pause on their ability to review these documents. she said, you can still go forward with parts of their investigation. if you want to talk to witnesses about how these documents were moved, or storage, you can do that. when it comes to reviewing the documents, forensic may be presenting them before a grand jury, which is a helpful thing to do when you re in the middle of a criminal investigation. you can t do anything like that. she does say, they can brief congress, so, we are waiting to see if that will co
subtle enough answer, yes. let me be clear with this in, the world of extremism, which i follow for decades, that s what i d refer to his validation. we have seen, on january 6th, there is a lot of people who watch leadership, whether it s lindsey graham, or other members of the white house, the president, lawyers, who watch leadership and determine whether that leadership is validating the citizens belief that they were robbed. you do not have to tell somebody to go out, and committed to active violence for them to say, well, if we were robbed, it is my constitutional right, and responsibility, to go to congress and storm it. that is the present to the mid states witnessing it and saying, let s have a redo, and the redo will happen if i m indicted. to me, is an extremist follower, that s not a political statement, that is a statement to anyone who falls extremists can understand. that is validation, don. julia, what do you think of that answer? absolutely. it s not even hinting an
of abortion. i have respect for south carolina. south carolina voters, here, a trust to define marriage, and to deal with the issue of abortion. now, hughes posey proposing a national pregnancy ban after 15 weeks of presidency. you re talking about why they change their tune. what are they saying? let s just be clear, it is a black and white a change. he said is there, we want to be left of the states, and you re right. now he is saying, there should be a 15-week ban. the answer is not about policy, it is not about philosophy, it is about the midterms. it is about the fact that republicans might want to talk about immigration. they really want to talk about the economy, and high inflation. they do not want to talk about the issue of abortion. that is what all democrats are talking about. that is a huge voter issue, across the battleground states. the democrats have, really,