too. recently i noticed somewhat of a change, and i expressed it here on fox. i warned that vigilante justice was coming. this isn t anything new from what we ve been experiencing for almost like two years in the country where the crimes have become more brazen. it is very clear that the criminals aren t afraid of law enforcement. as this continues in the country we re going to have vigilante justice and we can t have that in a civilized society. someone has to fill that void and we don t want that to happen but the leaders aren t doing anything about it, the mayors aren t stepping up to the plate, the das aren t stepping up to the plate, the judges aren t stepping up to the plate. on so who s going to do it and that s where vigilante justice comes into play. 80s that to brag or be right. i genuinely wanted to be wrong about this issue. but this is just basic science. when government creates this kind of void, someone or some idea will fill it. the most recent example is th
i said how about firing power? you ve got to have some accountability for the incompetence. lawrence: so, doc, will there ever be any trust in medicine anymore? because they did a lot of damage. especially when it comes to our children. i m not sure we even know the amount of damage that has been done because of the isolation that our kids had to experience. well, that s so true, lawrence. there has been so much misinformation spread by the u.s. government by the cdc that we had to close schools, that we had to mandate the vaccine, that myocarditis was not real, we had to mask toddlers and boost young people, that long covid was a real threat that infected won in five people, it didn t. we had so much misinformation they have to come back and address all of these things for public trust to be restored. lawrence: you know, doc, i think one of the great sins as well as in this tragedy of covid have been the masking debate.
flight attendants who are security officers, they are not cocktail waitresses, they are frontline security officers. if you don t listen to them, you don t abide by the rules, and you are violent or threatening or threaten the airplane to the extent in a lot of these cases the airplanes are getting diverted, that in and of itself is a dangerous thing in terms of moving airplanes from their flight plan. then we agree, right? in other words, you want the bar to be high enough that the violence or threat of stviolenc. but the idea that these guys who are threatening flight attendants get to have a h hacklers veto over a federal mandate rule regarding masks is ridiculous. i m not having this debate. i m not having the masking debate. and yet juliet, i hear you on the debate you don t want to have. i see you nodding, scott, and thinking about that. when it comes down to it, this
threatening or threaten the airplane to the extent that in a lot of these cases the airplanes are gettingdiverted, right? that in itself is a dangerous thing in terms of moving airplanes from their flight plans. then we agree, right? in other words, you want the bar to be high enough, violence or threat of violence. but the idea that these guys who are threatening flight attendants get to have a heckler s veto over a federal mandate rule regarding masks on a highly in a highly regulated industry is ridiculous. i m not having this debate. i m not going to have the masking debate. there is a rule, right? and yet, juliette, i hear you on the debate you don t want to have. but i see you nodding scott and thinking about that. when it comes down to it, this is in fact the debate that s happening on capitol hill in some respects, not because it s about whether it s stupid or not, but the debate of and the notion of, look, i m not comfortable just saying let s avoid having to have a conver