play. we will see if works. brian: did any of these guys work for unicef? we ll have to see. steve: all right. todd. steve: did the story and excellent leg work on it. unclear if hunter or now the president joe biden actually profited off of that meeting. and these meetings. because we know the republican investigators, they have got professional investigators combing through all this stuff, they have not indicated they found anything illegal at this point. you got to figure if they had something they would tell us. ainsley: one substantial profit on this deal. another one suggests that a meeting with the vice president or his chief of staff would have to occur asap in order to access additional bonds worth billions of dollars we know he was on the
brian: i don t think so. steve: it s delicious. watch this wild video. a police officer. ainsley: look, he sees it coming. steve: barely escapes. brian: what instincts. steve: almost crushed by that out of control car. the speed the 17-year-old driver was doing that guy is so lucky to be alive. plus, remember this. i have never discussed with my son or my brother or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses, period. never discussed it with his son. the newly released 2011 emails revealing hunter biden did help business associates get access to his then vice president father. brian: i know he wasn t discussing the kid out of wedlock because that doesn t come up, either. whatever it takes you take me to the problem i m ready for whatever it takes because i
dealings. you stand by your statement that did you not discuss any of your son s business dealings. yes, i stand by that statement. steve: he stands by the statement but it flies in the face of reality how is that possible? because we know that you see those things we don t know that they broke any laws, but, for him to say i have never spoken to my son about what he does overseas with these companies, that just seems crazy. ainsley: what dad is close to their son, doesn t talk about their son s business? steve: i talk to my son about his overseas business dealings all the time. ainsley: if i brought any of you all home to meet with meet my dad of course is he going to talk about fox news. brian: i think it s a joke because we have him on tape from the laptop saying about the the washington post story i don t think basically to paraphrase i didn t think anything is bad in there i think we avoided the worst stuff. i read the article. amazing how clued in he is about busine
like they are trying. 5 point agreement with mexico that says they will take back 30,000 people a week? brian: that s a joke. couple days worth of activity on the southern border. that will be nothing. the 1500 guard troops is a drop in the bucket for what s needed down there. i know my former colleagues are preparing for may 11th. the surge is already here. they re already overwhelmed. i m not hopeful what it will look like may 12th. steve: ron, the administration is in a pickle because everybody is covering of the end of title 42. so they have got to look like they are doing something. so they, you know, big announcement hey, we got a new five point plan. that s not going to change anything. here s the thing. if the administration is sending 1500 active duty troops to the border, i thought they said the border was secure. why do they need those guys? you are exactly right. you know, our hearts go out of to the men and women on the frontline at dmpleght hs. because they have b
mexican marines there. are you happy with this collaboration and these decisions? no. it s frustrating. as you pointed out, brian. we had an agreement with mexico for the migrant protection protocols in which they would take back everyone who claimed asylum, who wanted an immigration hearing in the united states. all they had to do was wait in mexico. that led to 45 year low in illegal immigration across the entire southwest border. mexico under strong leadership out of the white house, deployed 25,000 national guard members. brian: it was a fear of tariffs. absolutely. closing the border. tariffs 5%, 25%. leadership in the white house that said this is a problem. we know it s a problem because lori lightfoot talked about it being a problem this week. mayor adams talked about it being a problem this he can would. it s a problem across the united states. and this white house refuses to do anything that makes it look