during the debate process we are trying to see who our nominee will be. once we get that then we can reach out. i think it is great trump is in the race. i don t listen to the new york times because they are not great policymakers. but discussing issues is good. many of the candidates are having trump set the report, having trump set the tone. if i were running for office, i would look to carly fiorina and take a play from her playbook because she answers the questions and then goes on to her agenda. jon: as donald trump says things about the mexicans being killers and banning muslims. is that the way to grow the part? i am a registered republican. do i sound like a rapist? just because one person has that point of view. and he is saying the sentiment
jenna: you hear there are two episodes out there and the journalist doing them came out this morning in the second installment and said there are two schools of thoughts. those that really know bowe bergdahl like the investigating officer feel like five years with the taliban was enough and maybe a year sentence and that is fine. but the army as a whole has a different perspective. how do you see it? you wonder is it the army that has a different perspective or the political powers that be? that is a big theme in this case. if he is convicted that will be an issue the defense is going to look at on appeal. in a military trial jurors are not ordinary citizens but they are members of the military and members of the marshall all the way up to the president who is commander and chief. the argument the defense makes is it is weighing on the decision of the jury to convict because they feel like they have
steps underway to combat terror. listen to the improved coordination domestically and internationally with our partners in france, and germany and the uk. and the need to undermine the evolving tactics in the way they collect funds and also screening. background checking is huge if you are going to protect the homeland and that is an area where some on capitol hill are saying they are missing the mark. the immigration screening process is a critical element in protecting the american people. reviewing the backgrounds of foreign nationals before they come to the united states is crucial in understanding who is entering the united states. in the recent terror attacks in san bernardino highlight how important these background
a judge in riverside today. it may not happen today. the president is coming here tomorrow to meet with families who lost loved ones and those injured and first responders and that will happen tomorrow on the way to hawaii. it is a closed event. we don t expect him to speak and will speak and meet with them on the way to hawaii. it comes as the fbi director talks about the digital footprint they are piecing together. that is confirming the reporting we have been saying and that is these two have been radicalized before isis and have been communicating via the internet. take a listen: in late 2013, before there is a physical meeting of these two people resulting in their engagement and journey to the united states they are communicating online showing signs in the communication of their joint commitment to jihad and martyrdom.
it, how will you change it as president? we can slow down the process and force them to make changes and there is no doubt and we can and we should and will. there is an effort with many conservatives to make it happen. there is a way to do it. the question is whether the willingness is there. my point is over the last few years there is a moment when the establishment in washington and both parties get together and get enough votes and cram it down people s throat. this is a massive piece of legislation. over a trillion in spending. it was just announced and in 48 hours everyone has to make a decision about what to do. i know identify to say we will oppose it and should use procedures to force the slow down and changes. jenna: how would you slow down the bill? what would be your role?