acting debut this week. she stars on lifetime army wives playing herself. the episode is set to air sunday. those are a couple of things we thought you should know this hour. and in today s crossing the line, attorney perkins the ahead of the family research counsel says that the federal judge who overturned california s ban on same-sex marriage should have recused himself because in perkins words the judge is openly gay. there were celebrations last week after the ruling was overturned. what you have is one judge who thinks he knows and a district level judge and an openly homosexual judge who says he knows better than not only 7 million voters in the state of california but voters in 30 states across the nation that have passed marriage amendments. this is far from over. so judge walker has in fact never addressed the speculations about his sexual orientation, perkins cited a san francisco
in order to bring in more money. i think it s a little bit different than going to a baseball game and, you know, going to a strip club. there s this is it s not if this were an isolated incident, david, it would be one thing. we saw just a few weeks ago the rnc announce they were hiring ted olson, constitutional attorney, to represent them potentially before the supreme court on a campaign finance issue. well, that also is the same ted olson who is working to overturn prop 8 out in california where 7 million voters voted to defend marriage as being between a man and a woman. he happens to be a very effective lawyer. you want the best for that case? he s not the only attorney in the country. that was celebrated when they hired him and it was a slap in the face to the social conservatives who work within the republican party and the 31 states that have passed marriage amendments so it has become increasingly clear that the rnc is tone-deaf to the concerns of so many social c
election. they can t rely on people people turning out to deny rights. if you look at 2004, 11 states passed anti-marriage amendments. i m not going to call them anti-gay marriage amendments, because that s what they are. the karl roves of the world counted on those voters to elect bush. they did. this year we had three states in the nation in history to legalize g marriage, to expand marriage equality by popular vote. this is no longer a case of in. this is a case of the american people deciding, you know what, marriage is for everyone. it s a civil right and everyone should have it. jonathan, republicans as you know threw every dirty trick at the president and lost. ling the president as some mon. non-american who disdains judeo christian values and hands out