Their specific comments. They reviewed the findings that we have and we had a series of conversations about the specific legislation and discussing things that could be made from zoning and land use perspectives and then some of the things that would require further investment and discussion with other city agencies. Thank you,. Sure. The specific changes are, expanding the boundary in which impacting money can be spent to provide funding for projects in the adjacent neighborhoods. Broadening the membership relative to the first, that is the existing boundary of one mile . Currently, the funds, the infrastructure funds can be spent in the planning area or within 250 feet . Ok. Broadening the membership of the market activity cac, allowing a land dedication option for Affordable Housing requirements in the adjacent neighborhoods and new requirement to support Community Serving use thats the groundfloor. Expanding the unit mixed requirement and new general plan policy to apply a racial a
Be turned around within 72 hours but were seeing back ups especially with our provider labs and some of our own labs within the city. We are backing up seven days, ten days at this point. Thats something were seeing across the state and across the country. thank you director. Thank you madam mayor and dr. C olfax for your time. Any followup questions or questions after this meeting can be directed to dem press at sf dot org. Thank you for your time and that concludes todays press conference. Concludes todays press good afternoon welcome to the land use and Transportation Committee San Francisco board of supervisors for today monday july 20th. Im the chair of the Committee Supervisor aaron peskin joined by supervisor ahsha safai and dean preston and joined by colleague supervisor Hillary Ronen. Do you have any announcements . Due to the covid19 emergency to protect board members, City Employees and public, board of supervisors legislative chamber remain closed. Committee members will at
Past 80 years and in carrying for this art and as i indicated in an article that was in the journal california history earlier this year. So, i was especially saddened to read ucsfs proposal to destroy this art and on a birds view. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Are there any other members of the public who would like to comment on this item number four . Hello, my name is Richard Rothman and i am interested in murals in an fran and on occasion, ucsf is what we go into the hall and they told me they were going to build around them. If youve been in i called my contact at ucsf and they were going to build around them so i was wondering if one of the supervisors could ask mr. Newman why they changed their mind. The last time i talked in february and when i found out in june that they were going to destroy them. Why cant ucsf get around tobin hall and save the hall. Its very dangerous to move these murals. Its not something you want to do and maybe at the very, very last resort b
And again not crafting it as a harassment statute but rather a privacy when. And making it a criminal offense. I think it is moving forward in trying to get laws like this past in all the states is that it educates prosecutors throughout, up and down the levels of government. It really gets the word out to all of Law Enforcement that this is, in fact, a crime. We still need to maintain state laws in all 50 states need them. The fbi is not going to be looking into every single case. We cant expect them to. They have much more discretion about what case to take, so we are local on four servers to be stopping nonconsensual porn on a local level. The Cyber Civil Rights Initiative has a model on our website which is very similar to the illinois law that josh talked about which we would recommend that the 15 remaining states look to. And the other trend we are seeing more and more to civil remedies. Weve been talking about how criminal laws really deter, but we should all have options. And s
Mike rogers said we havent seen the terrorist attack that we havent talked about it for 15 years now. Theres lots of reasons for that. But theres a lot of vulnerabilities, and actually have a major impact not in the u. S. But also around the world for not finishing touches for the United States and the private sector is part of that. You know, in dod my job is to worry about the big cyberattack him cyberattack, but i also worry sometimes when they do things that impact the centers of gravity for the u. S. , which is the i. T. Industry in Silicon Valley and cybersecurity we need to think a lot about that. It makes it even harder because you want to make sure you are not hurting the economy and one of the Great Centers of gravity. Okay, thank you so much eric, john and chris. We will have our next panel soon. [applause] thinks anna and thanks to the department of defense, carla and the department of defense birthday. I want to encourage weve had great comments and questions coming off tw