it. what bothered you? she s not in the video there. is a two-minute plus video. it is a gay couple getting married, which was really striking frankly. you wouldn t have seen that four years ago let alone three years ago in the president s we are election. it is a hispanic speech somebody else announcing a job, people starting a business. this is very much what she is trying to send the message to is i m a fighter for you. there is not about me t. lens is very much on the voters. it is a total speech from what she announced last time in 28 i m in and i m in it to win. that was not so workable for her. so now she s trying to make it clear this is about voters. this is not about herself and her ambition. experience often the best teacher. moving along, give us the ups and down, what do you think, mark what was the upside on this? i think if hillary clinton runs her entire campaign only through videos she will be the next president of the united states. honestly this is her streng
every poll about pope francis shows he is a rock star more than the american politicians we survey. 37% say they ve given him more he has given a more positive opinion of the catholic church. that s similar to an nbc, the wall street journal poll released on this about a week or so ago. and shows that he is very popular and a lot more popular than all of the other things we were talking about, jose. mark what s interesting to me he got lower positives among the latino community than at large, right? right. i can t explain that at all, but one of the interesting findings what was great about the poll jose, you get the total respondents as well as a substantial sub sample of latino respondents in the poll. good gauge of the latino community. mark murray, thanks. we are watching video from walter scott s family home in north charleston. mayor and chief of police just arrived to visit scott s family.
screaming when there is blood going down his throat? why aren t the screams garbled? if he is being smothered, why aren t the screams mufled? i think will you hear those type of arguments. mark what, are you listening for? i think all of those issues that were just discussed are very easily resolved and they ll be resolved now that the defense even has a duty or responsibility to do so because the state made a fatal error in my opinion. they charged second degree homicide rather than charging this straight up as manslaughter, where they would have been able to make a better argument that george zimmerman over reacted, that it was irresponsible and this was a manslaughter case. they spent 90% of this trial starting with opening argument until about two days ago trying to make everybody believe that it was in fact george zimmerman who was a top trayvon martin and when they finally came to the conclusion that she should have done a year and several months