it s simple math. at the rate we re going, it s not sustainable. mark tweets at team cavuto, missed you. you re a light house. fair and balanced. thank you. allison said, hey, big shot, get over yourself. the only reason why you have a job where you can lecture anyone is because you have photographs of your bosses in compromises positio positions. how did you know, allison? how did you know? then there s cliff that says, hey, cavuto, i stopped watching your show because you re so god awful. anything you want to say? yes, cliff. good-bye. back to my fans. like linda. mr. cavuto, you look great and your show is enlightening. thank you for presenting with us honest journalism. and another says, neil, i like you and all, but don t you think presenting yourself as a financial super hero is a bit
to make sure that people are finding themselves in the good position. juan, we asked people to tweet in questions. mark tweets, why would the gop embrace a one year delay of obama care or the individual mandate when it doesn t change anything except help democrats win 2014 elections? there is now a proposal by partisan from joe manchin, democrat and mark kirk, republican to delay by one year the individual mandate. mark ask asks why would republicans sign onto that delay? i don t know. it depends on which republicans you re talking abtsds. they re tea party people. think back to ted cruz and the shutdown. they want to destroy obama care totally. one of the questions back then was to delay the obama care. . that came out like if we can t shut it down, will you buy into having a delay?
hour, we re going to ex more the mid-east peace efforts with former senator george mitchell. and it s time now for our question of the day. here s what i asked you. how do you think the supreme court should vote on gay marriage? mark tweets, it won t be a vote for or against gay marriage. they will vote against discrimination based on sexual orientation. and tony wheeler left this facebook message, ruling against marriage equality is denying an eligible person for the right to marry based on the gender of their intended spouse. sounds like discrimination to me. thank you for your thoughtful replies. write me on twitter @alexwitt. in half an hour, joining me for discussions jonathan turley