to say about this. he s on the stand tomorrow. that will be interesting. thank you. kelly s court is back in session. joining me to discuss it is a former defense attorney. oh, boo-hoo, it was the alcohol that made me do it. i was so drunk that i had to go commit an armed robbery, mark. yes. yes. throw this case out already, megyn. listen, i was very confident when i said numerous times this is a motion for a field trip, not a motion for a new trial because that is all that he s going to get out of this. galan galanter, a 30-year veteran, will not take the stand tomorrow and say, you know what, i committed malpractice. gee, even though it s 101 in the criminal arena to convey plea offers to defendants, oh, gosh, i forgot. let me fall on the sword for o.j. simpson. it ain t gonna happen. i like the picture we had up of o.j.
confusion in the aftermath of this tragic event. listen, i have to tell you it is sprieurprising. i may be naive but jay carney said this. the white house and the state department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to the talking points by either of those two these two institutions were changing the word consulate to diplomatic facility. that originated from the intelligence community. they reflected the best assessments of what they thought had happened. maybe i m just naive because i was still believing jay carney until i saw this evidence, mark. well, simon said he has been on this show ten times saying that there was confusion. he s actually been on the show ten times saying susan rice read
of the state department officials last october. the cia also knew better because this station chief in tripoli on the 12th of september cabled back that this was a terrorist attack. perhaps the best that could be said for the inclusion of demonstrations and protests and even the early versions of the talking points was that there was perhaps an instance here of analytic laziness that is to say we observed a lot of protests outside u.s. installations around the world on the 10th of september. we have this situation on the 11th. it must be part and parcel of the same thing. james rosen, thank you. thank you. for more, we re joined by simon rosenberg, president of a left-leaning think tank. and mark tooesen, a former speechwriter for president george w. bush. your reaction to the report we went through, mark? well, it is shocking.
order now and get this document shredder, a $29 value, free. protect yourself now with lifelock. [click click, .] ever show you the references in discovery to your drinking privately? no. did they ever tell you it s a possible fact you could use a fact you could use is in your defense? absolutely not. megyn: mark, arthur, if that is true, is it a problem? that s a perfect way to put it. it s a problem. it s not like, okay, per se, reversal, but it s one thing that a judge has to take into
about any plea offer. if they can prove he didn t do that, then that is a reason for this judge to at least give this judge to at least give seemed like he was laughing and joking too much, and made a remark, the only thing i wish we had the d.a. s case is a joke and i wish we had a jury right then and there. that s basically it. because he thought the case was so laughable. megyn: mark? loving publicity doesn t prove this case, and even arthur conceded when he was a young lawyer he still did the right thing. hold on. art, you are right. so i will concede it is possible, it is theoretically possible that oj can win this, but i can say anything is